PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFIFX vs. RGAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFIFX vs. RGAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Fundamental Investors Class F-1 (AFIFX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFIFX achieves a 14.31% return, which is significantly higher than RGAGX's 9.36% return. Over the past 10 years, AFIFX has underperformed RGAGX with an annualized return of 14.75%, while RGAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.30% annualized return.


AFIFX

1D
-0.69%
1M
4.25%
YTD
14.31%
6M
15.30%
1Y
33.23%
3Y*
25.72%
5Y*
14.50%
10Y*
14.75%

RGAGX

1D
-0.80%
1M
5.24%
YTD
9.36%
6M
8.89%
1Y
25.11%
3Y*
25.20%
5Y*
12.43%
10Y*
16.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFIFX vs. RGAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AFIFX
American Funds Fundamental Investors Class F-1
14.31%24.12%22.68%25.78%-16.69%22.36%14.85%27.00%-8.19%22.70%
RGAGX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6
9.36%20.08%28.41%37.66%-30.53%19.67%38.30%29.22%-2.88%26.53%

Correlation

The correlation between AFIFX and RGAGX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2009

0.96

The correlation between AFIFX and RGAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFIFX vs. RGAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFIFX
AFIFX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
AFIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
AFIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

RGAGX
RGAGX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
RGAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
RGAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFIFX vs. RGAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Fundamental Investors Class F-1 (AFIFX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AFIFXRGAGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.30

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

1.87

+1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.61

7.32

+7.29

AFIFX vs. RGAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFIFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the RGAGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFIFX and RGAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AFIFXRGAGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

1.69

+0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.62

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.83

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.85

-0.27

Drawdowns

AFIFX vs. RGAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFIFX drawdown since its inception was -53.25%, which is greater than RGAGX's maximum drawdown of -36.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFIFX and RGAGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFIFXRGAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.25%

-36.19%

-17.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.67%

-13.71%

+3.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.99%

-21.54%

+3.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.11%

-36.19%

+11.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.92%

-36.19%

+2.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.69%

-1.12%

+0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.37%

-5.49%

-1.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

3.50%

-1.20%

Volatility

AFIFX vs. RGAGX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Fundamental Investors Class F-1 (AFIFX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX) have volatilities of 3.81% and 3.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFIFXRGAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

3.86%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.79%

11.66%

-0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.76%

15.16%

-1.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.79%

20.24%

-3.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.72%

19.69%

-1.97%

AFIFX vs. RGAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFIFX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than RGAGX's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFIFX vs. RGAGX - Dividend Comparison

AFIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.43%, less than RGAGX's 10.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFIFX
American Funds Fundamental Investors Class F-1
7.43%8.48%8.84%5.76%4.92%10.91%2.57%6.86%9.21%7.21%4.65%6.01%
RGAGX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6
10.05%10.99%9.29%7.70%4.44%8.49%4.57%7.93%12.36%7.34%6.95%9.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, AFIFX and RGAGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RGAGX has higher volatility (3.86%) compared to AFIFX (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFIFX dropped -53.25% vs RGAGX's -36.19%.

AFIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFIFX and RGAGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer