AFIF vs. JMMF
AFIF (Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF) and JMMF (JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AFIF is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Regents Park Funds, while JMMF is a Money Market fund actively managed by JPMorgan. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. AFIF charges 1.08%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for JMMF.
Performance
AFIF vs. JMMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFIF achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly lower than JMMF's 1.64% return.
AFIF
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.55%
- 1Y
- 4.88%
- 3Y*
- 7.41%
- 5Y*
- 3.74%
- 10Y*
- —
JMMF
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.64%
- 6M
- 1.67%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AFIF vs. JMMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AFIF Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF | 1.55% | 0.30% |
JMMF JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF | 1.64% | 0.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFIF and JMMF is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFIF vs. JMMF — Risk / Return Rank
AFIF
JMMF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AFIF vs. JMMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF (AFIF) and JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF (JMMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AFIF | JMMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.29 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AFIF vs. JMMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFIF drawdown since its inception was -10.29%, which is greater than JMMF's maximum drawdown of -0.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFIF and JMMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFIF | JMMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.29% | -0.14% | -10.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | 0.00% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.21% | -0.01% | -2.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.37% | — | — |
Volatility
AFIF vs. JMMF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFIF | JMMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.37% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.99% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.73% | 0.51% | +2.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.40% | 0.51% | +3.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.24% | 0.51% | +5.73% |
AFIF vs. JMMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFIF has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than JMMF's 0.16% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFIF vs. JMMF - Dividend Comparison
AFIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, more than JMMF's 1.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFIF Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF | 3.73% | 3.52% | 5.61% | 5.91% | 3.49% | 1.73% | 1.25% | 2.54% | 0.69% |
JMMF JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF | 1.80% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFIF and JMMF have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JMMF is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JMMF is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for AFIF.
AFIF has the higher dividend yield at 3.73%, compared with 1.80% for JMMF.
AFIF is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while JMMF is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: Regents Park Funds and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for AFIF and 0.16% for JMMF.
Find the right allocation for AFIF and JMMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer