PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFGPX vs. PPYPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFGPX vs. PPYPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger International Focus Fund (AFGPX) and PIMCO RAE International Fund (PPYPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFGPX achieves a 11.44% return, which is significantly higher than PPYPX's 9.20% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AFGPX having a 8.85% annualized return and PPYPX not far ahead at 9.14%.


AFGPX

1D
-3.68%
1M
4.27%
YTD
11.44%
6M
10.90%
1Y
12.68%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
3.39%
10Y*
8.85%

PPYPX

1D
-0.92%
1M
-3.95%
YTD
9.20%
6M
5.08%
1Y
21.89%
3Y*
16.07%
5Y*
8.11%
10Y*
9.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFGPX vs. PPYPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AFGPX
Alger International Focus Fund
11.44%18.22%5.20%18.03%-31.00%9.09%43.38%27.60%-21.49%25.80%
PPYPX
PIMCO RAE International Fund
9.20%31.34%-1.15%18.13%-8.73%10.68%2.05%16.43%-15.49%24.89%

Correlation

The correlation between AFGPX and PPYPX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between AFGPX and PPYPX has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFGPX vs. PPYPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFGPX
AFGPX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
AFGPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFGPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFGPX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
AFGPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFGPX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

PPYPX
PPYPX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
PPYPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPYPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPYPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
PPYPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPYPX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFGPX vs. PPYPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger International Focus Fund (AFGPX) and PIMCO RAE International Fund (PPYPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AFGPXPPYPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.32

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

3.07

-1.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.99

9.74

-5.75

AFGPX vs. PPYPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFGPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the PPYPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFGPX and PPYPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AFGPX vs. PPYPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFGPX drawdown since its inception was -63.63%, which is greater than PPYPX's maximum drawdown of -42.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFGPX and PPYPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFGPXPPYPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.63%

-42.48%

-21.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.92%

-7.48%

-5.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.34%

-14.00%

-1.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.17%

-35.65%

-6.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.17%

-42.48%

+0.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.68%

-5.44%

+1.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.39%

-10.11%

-9.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.68%

2.35%

+1.33%

Volatility

AFGPX vs. PPYPX - Volatility Comparison

Alger International Focus Fund (AFGPX) has a higher volatility of 9.13% compared to PIMCO RAE International Fund (PPYPX) at 3.28%. This indicates that AFGPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPYPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFGPXPPYPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.13%

3.28%

+5.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.92%

10.25%

+7.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.53%

12.99%

+7.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.62%

19.54%

+1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.60%

18.75%

+0.85%

AFGPX vs. PPYPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFGPX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than PPYPX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFGPX vs. PPYPX - Dividend Comparison

AFGPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.39%, more than PPYPX's 7.12% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AFGPX
Alger International Focus Fund
12.39%13.81%6.27%0.00%0.00%10.04%0.00%4.42%2.96%5.26%1.26%
PPYPX
PIMCO RAE International Fund
7.12%7.78%6.57%10.09%7.20%27.06%2.23%4.20%5.96%2.53%2.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


AFGPX and PPYPX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AFGPX has higher volatility (9.13%) compared to PPYPX (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFGPX dropped -63.63% vs PPYPX's -42.48%.

PPYPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFGPX and PPYPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer