AFGPX vs. ALMAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Alger International Focus Fund (AFGPX) and Alger Weatherbie Specialized Growth Fund (ALMAX).
AFGPX is managed by Alger. It was launched on Nov 10, 1986. ALMAX is managed by Alger. It was launched on May 8, 2002.
Performance
AFGPX vs. ALMAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AFGPX vs. ALMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFGPX Alger International Focus Fund | -6.08% | 18.22% | 5.20% | 18.03% | -31.00% | 9.09% | 43.38% | 27.60% | -21.49% | 25.80% |
ALMAX Alger Weatherbie Specialized Growth Fund | -15.06% | 0.50% | 13.78% | 11.22% | -38.11% | 5.83% | 56.85% | 39.17% | -4.10% | 21.83% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFGPX achieves a -6.08% return, which is significantly higher than ALMAX's -15.06% return. Over the past 10 years, AFGPX has underperformed ALMAX with an annualized return of 6.47%, while ALMAX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.97% annualized return.
AFGPX
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- -11.21%
- YTD
- -6.08%
- 6M
- -8.34%
- 1Y
- 8.29%
- 3Y*
- 8.68%
- 5Y*
- 1.67%
- 10Y*
- 6.47%
ALMAX
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- -11.84%
- YTD
- -15.06%
- 6M
- -13.51%
- 1Y
- 0.51%
- 3Y*
- 1.57%
- 5Y*
- -6.88%
- 10Y*
- 6.97%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AFGPX vs. ALMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFGPX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than ALMAX's 1.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AFGPX vs. ALMAX — Risk / Return Rank
AFGPX
ALMAX
AFGPX vs. ALMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger International Focus Fund (AFGPX) and Alger Weatherbie Specialized Growth Fund (ALMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AFGPX | ALMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.38 | 0.01 | +0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.65 | 0.19 | +0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.02 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | -0.11 | +0.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.52 | -0.40 | +1.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFGPX | ALMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 | 0.01 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | -0.24 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | 0.26 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.29 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between AFGPX and ALMAX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AFGPX vs. ALMAX - Dividend Comparison
AFGPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.70%, while ALMAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFGPX Alger International Focus Fund | 14.70% | 13.81% | 6.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.04% | 0.00% | 4.42% | 2.96% | 5.26% | 1.26% | 0.00% |
ALMAX Alger Weatherbie Specialized Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 24.48% | 4.64% | 4.00% | 9.86% | 0.00% | 12.44% | 55.85% |
Drawdowns
AFGPX vs. ALMAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFGPX drawdown since its inception was -63.63%, which is greater than ALMAX's maximum drawdown of -60.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFGPX and ALMAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFGPX | ALMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.63% | -60.51% | -3.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.92% | -20.91% | +7.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.17% | -53.89% | +11.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.17% | -53.89% | +11.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.92% | -44.85% | +31.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.50% | -17.19% | -2.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.49% | 6.01% | -2.52% |
Volatility
AFGPX vs. ALMAX - Volatility Comparison
Alger International Focus Fund (AFGPX) has a higher volatility of 9.02% compared to Alger Weatherbie Specialized Growth Fund (ALMAX) at 7.42%. This indicates that AFGPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AFGPX | ALMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.02% | 7.42% | +1.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.19% | 15.17% | -0.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.98% | 24.27% | -5.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.94% | 29.06% | -9.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.41% | 27.09% | -7.68% |