AFB vs. FSMUX
AFB (AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund) and FSMUX (Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 3 years, AFB returned 7.29%/yr vs 3.86%/yr for FSMUX. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AFB charges 1.56%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for FSMUX.
Performance
AFB vs. FSMUX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFB achieves a 6.20% return, which is significantly higher than FSMUX's 1.47% return.
AFB
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 1.72%
- YTD
- 6.20%
- 6M
- 5.81%
- 1Y
- 15.69%
- 3Y*
- 7.29%
- 5Y*
- -1.26%
- 10Y*
- 1.60%
FSMUX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 1.47%
- 6M
- 1.83%
- 1Y
- 7.07%
- 3Y*
- 3.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AFB vs. FSMUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFB AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund | 6.20% | 4.41% | 4.10% | 7.41% | -25.93% | 0.85% |
FSMUX Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund | 1.47% | 3.14% | 2.99% | 6.78% | -11.25% | 0.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFB and FSMUX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2021 | 0.40 |
The correlation between AFB and FSMUX shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.47 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFB vs. FSMUX — Risk / Return Rank
AFB
FSMUX
AFB vs. FSMUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund (AFB) and Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AFB | FSMUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.71 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 3.15 | -0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.98 | 11.49 | -1.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFB | FSMUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01 | 2.69 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.11 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
AFB vs. FSMUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFB drawdown since its inception was -50.98%, which is greater than FSMUX's maximum drawdown of -16.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFB and FSMUX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFB | FSMUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.98% | -16.27% | -34.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.96% | -2.68% | -3.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.32% | -5.95% | -10.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.57% | 0.00% | -9.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.98% | -5.46% | -3.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.58% | 1.83% | -0.25% |
Volatility
AFB vs. FSMUX - Volatility Comparison
AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund (AFB) has a higher volatility of 2.64% compared to Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX) at 1.21%. This indicates that AFB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSMUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFB | FSMUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.64% | 1.21% | +1.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.73% | 2.10% | +3.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.88% | 3.16% | +4.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.94% | 4.64% | +6.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.24% | 4.64% | +6.60% |
AFB vs. FSMUX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFB has a 1.56% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMUX's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
AFB vs. FSMUX - Dividend Comparison
AFB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, more than FSMUX's 2.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFB AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund | 5.02% | 4.72% | 3.83% | 3.62% | 5.26% | 4.32% | 4.18% | 3.93% | 4.53% | 4.71% | 5.34% | 5.80% |
FSMUX Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund | 2.99% | 3.26% | 3.74% | 3.18% | 2.14% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFB and FSMUX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AFB has higher volatility (2.64%) compared to FSMUX (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFB dropped -50.98% vs FSMUX's -16.27%.
FSMUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AFB and FSMUX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer