PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFB vs. AGDAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFB vs. AGDAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund (AFB) and AB High Income Fund (AGDAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFB achieves a 7.81% return, which is significantly higher than AGDAX's 1.64% return. Over the past 10 years, AFB has underperformed AGDAX with an annualized return of 1.56%, while AGDAX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.61% annualized return.


AFB

1D
0.18%
1M
4.12%
YTD
7.81%
6M
8.92%
1Y
16.88%
3Y*
6.94%
5Y*
-1.45%
10Y*
1.56%

AGDAX

1D
-0.14%
1M
0.56%
YTD
1.64%
6M
2.34%
1Y
6.60%
3Y*
8.80%
5Y*
3.61%
10Y*
4.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFB vs. AGDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AFB
AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund
7.81%4.41%4.10%7.41%-25.93%7.25%7.80%20.13%-5.43%6.15%
AGDAX
AB High Income Fund
1.64%8.06%7.36%13.63%-12.45%3.87%2.91%13.71%-5.29%7.94%

Correlation

The correlation between AFB and AGDAX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2002

0.19

The correlation between AFB and AGDAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.38 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFB vs. AGDAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFB
AFB Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
AFB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFB Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
AFB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFB Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

AGDAX
AGDAX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
AGDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
AGDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFB vs. AGDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund (AFB) and AB High Income Fund (AGDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AFBAGDAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.47

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

2.51

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.71

12.21

-1.50

AFB vs. AGDAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFB Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the AGDAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFB and AGDAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AFB vs. AGDAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFB drawdown since its inception was -50.98%, which is greater than AGDAX's maximum drawdown of -45.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFB and AGDAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFBAGDAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.98%

-45.59%

-5.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.96%

-2.76%

-3.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.32%

-4.24%

-12.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.17%

-16.96%

-18.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.17%

-25.82%

-9.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.19%

-0.43%

-7.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.98%

-4.46%

-4.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

0.57%

+1.01%

Volatility

AFB vs. AGDAX - Volatility Comparison

AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund (AFB) has a higher volatility of 2.68% compared to AB High Income Fund (AGDAX) at 0.96%. This indicates that AFB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFBAGDAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.68%

0.96%

+1.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.01%

2.62%

+3.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.06%

3.35%

+4.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.97%

4.94%

+6.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.25%

5.63%

+5.62%

AFB vs. AGDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFB has a 1.56% expense ratio, which is higher than AGDAX's 0.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFB vs. AGDAX - Dividend Comparison

AFB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, less than AGDAX's 6.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFB
AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund
5.06%4.72%3.83%3.62%5.26%4.32%4.18%3.93%4.53%4.71%5.34%5.80%
AGDAX
AB High Income Fund
6.71%6.85%5.89%6.53%6.79%4.95%5.86%6.27%7.47%5.84%6.25%7.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


AFB and AGDAX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AFB has higher volatility (2.68%) compared to AGDAX (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFB dropped -50.98% vs AGDAX's -45.59%.

AFB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFB and AGDAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer