PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AER vs. CENX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AER vs. CENX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AerCap Holdings N.V. (AER) and Century Aluminum Company (CENX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AER achieves a 2.71% return, which is significantly lower than CENX's 26.42% return. Over the past 10 years, AER has underperformed CENX with an annualized return of 15.83%, while CENX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.96% annualized return.


AER

1D
1.23%
1M
5.94%
YTD
2.71%
6M
1.36%
1Y
28.57%
3Y*
35.35%
5Y*
22.65%
10Y*
15.83%

CENX

1D
-4.22%
1M
-23.86%
YTD
26.42%
6M
33.18%
1Y
192.90%
3Y*
78.02%
5Y*
32.11%
10Y*
22.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AER vs. CENX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AER
AerCap Holdings N.V.
2.71%51.66%29.81%27.43%-10.85%43.53%-25.85%55.23%-24.73%26.44%
CENX
Century Aluminum Company
26.42%115.04%50.08%48.41%-50.60%50.14%46.77%2.80%-62.78%129.44%

Correlation

The correlation between AER and CENX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2006

0.40

Over the past year, the correlation between AER and CENX has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AER:

$24.21B

CENX:

$5.18B

EPS

AER:

$22.98

CENX:

$3.54

PE Ratio

AER:

6.39

CENX:

13.99

PEG Ratio

AER:

0.16

CENX:

0.04

PS Ratio

AER:

3.09

CENX:

1.92

PB Ratio

AER:

1.32

CENX:

4.50

Total Revenue (TTM)

AER:

$8.11B

CENX:

$2.54B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AER:

$4.29B

CENX:

$322.30M

EBITDA (TTM)

AER:

$6.71B

CENX:

$466.30M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AER vs. CENX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AER
AER Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
AER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AER Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
AER Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
AER Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
AER Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

CENX
CENX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
CENX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
CENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CENX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AER vs. CENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AerCap Holdings N.V. (AER) and Century Aluminum Company (CENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AERCENXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.41

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

6.94

-5.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.92

22.15

-17.23

AER vs. CENX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AER Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the CENX Sharpe Ratio of 3.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AER and CENX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AER vs. CENX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AER drawdown since its inception was -94.38%, roughly equal to the maximum CENX drawdown of -98.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AER and CENX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AERCENXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.38%

-98.67%

+4.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.77%

-27.98%

+13.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.66%

-42.77%

+27.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.14%

-82.10%

+36.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.86%

-87.51%

+11.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.63%

-38.08%

+33.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.38%

-61.10%

+32.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.82%

8.75%

-2.93%

Volatility

AER vs. CENX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AerCap Holdings N.V. (AER) is 6.65%, while Century Aluminum Company (CENX) has a volatility of 22.52%. This indicates that AER experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CENX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AERCENXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.65%

22.52%

-15.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.35%

47.80%

-27.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.33%

63.93%

-38.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.23%

72.19%

-39.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.90%

70.70%

-28.80%

Dividends

AER vs. CENX - Dividend Comparison

AER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, while CENX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
AER
AerCap Holdings N.V.
0.91%0.75%0.78%
CENX
Century Aluminum Company
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

AER vs. CENX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AerCap Holdings N.V. and Century Aluminum Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
2.16B
649.20M
(AER) Total Revenue
(CENX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AER vs. CENX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between AerCap Holdings N.V. and Century Aluminum Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
65.4%
18.3%
Portfolio components
AER - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AerCap Holdings N.V. reported a gross profit of 1.41B and revenue of 2.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.4%.

CENX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Century Aluminum Company reported a gross profit of 118.80M and revenue of 649.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.3%.

AER - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AerCap Holdings N.V. reported an operating income of 1.28B and revenue of 2.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 59.3%.

CENX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Century Aluminum Company reported an operating income of 374.00M and revenue of 649.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 57.6%.

AER - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AerCap Holdings N.V. reported a net income of 818.12M and revenue of 2.16B, resulting in a net margin of 37.8%.

CENX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Century Aluminum Company reported a net income of 337.50M and revenue of 649.20M, resulting in a net margin of 52.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AER and CENX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CENX has higher volatility (22.52%) compared to AER (6.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AER dropped -94.38% vs CENX's -98.67%.

CENX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.04 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AER and CENX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer