AEPFX vs. PCLIX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

AEPFX (American Funds EUPAC Fund Class F-2) and PCLIX (PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund) are both mutual funds - AEPFX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by American Funds, while PCLIX is a Commodities fund managed by PIMCO. Over the past 10 years, AEPFX returned 8.53%/yr vs 12.80%/yr for PCLIX. Their 0.34 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. AEPFX charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for PCLIX.

Performance

AEPFX vs. PCLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds EUPAC Fund Class F-2 (AEPFX) and PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEPFX achieves a 9.52% return, which is significantly lower than PCLIX's 34.31% return. Over the past 10 years, AEPFX has underperformed PCLIX with an annualized return of 8.53%, while PCLIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.80% annualized return.

AEPFX

• 1D: 3.16%
• 1M: -0.78%
• 6M: 3.79%
• YTD: 9.52%
• 1Y: 24.52%
• 3Y*: 13.50%
• 5Y*: 4.99%
• 10Y*: 8.53%
• ALL TIME*: 5.80%

PCLIX

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 9.86%
• 6M: 25.51%
• YTD: 34.31%
• 1Y: 39.01%
• 3Y*: 13.77%
• 5Y*: 15.42%
• 10Y*: 12.80%
• ALL TIME*: 5.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AEPFX American Funds EUPAC Fund Class F-2	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
PCLIX PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

AEPFX vs. PCLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AEPFX American Funds EUPAC Fund Class F-2	9.52%	29.19%	2.89%	15.98%	-22.86%	2.74%	25.12%	27.28%	-17.41%	31.04%
PCLIX PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund	34.31%	5.76%	8.53%	0.69%	23.32%	43.83%	-9.18%	19.37%	-12.02%	10.86%

Correlation

The correlation between AEPFX and PCLIX is -0.10, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.10
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.08
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.20
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2010	0.34

The correlation between AEPFX and PCLIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AEPFX vs. PCLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AEPFX

AEPFX Risk / Return Rank: 48
AEPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
AEPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
AEPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
AEPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
AEPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 45

PCLIX

PCLIX Risk / Return Rank: 72
PCLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
PCLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
PCLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
PCLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
PCLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AEPFX vs. PCLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds EUPAC Fund Class F-2 (AEPFX) and PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AEPFX	PCLIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	1.81	-0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	2.41	-0.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.31	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.81	2.34	-0.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.41	7.89	-1.48

AEPFX vs. PCLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEPFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the PCLIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEPFX and PCLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AEPFX vs. PCLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEPFX drawdown since its inception was -48.79%, smaller than the maximum PCLIX drawdown of -66.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEPFX and PCLIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AEPFX	PCLIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.79%	-66.60%	+17.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.54%	-15.39%	+2.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.64%	-15.39%	-0.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.37%	-21.59%	-15.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.37%	-51.78%	+14.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.53%	-6.44%	+2.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.94%	-24.00%	+13.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.53%	4.59%	-1.06%

Volatility

AEPFX vs. PCLIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds EUPAC Fund Class F-2 (AEPFX) is 5.66%, while PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLIX) has a volatility of 5.97%. This indicates that AEPFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AEPFX	PCLIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.66%	5.97%	-0.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.23%	17.90%	-2.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.35%	19.99%	-2.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.00%	19.48%	-2.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.88%	40.52%	-23.64%

AEPFX vs. PCLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AEPFX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than PCLIX's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

AEPFX vs. PCLIX - Dividend Comparison

AEPFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.75%, more than PCLIX's 10.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AEPFX American Funds EUPAC Fund Class F-2	16.75%	13.92%	4.86%	3.86%	1.93%	10.10%	0.34%	3.04%	3.06%	4.89%	1.54%	3.35%
PCLIX PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund	10.37%	2.45%	7.50%	5.06%	42.60%	73.41%	0.77%	2.46%	18.58%	12.63%	0.16%	2.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AEPFX and PCLIX in my portfolio?

AEPFX and PCLIX have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AEPFX or PCLIX?

PCLIX has higher volatility (5.97%) compared to AEPFX (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AEPFX dropped -48.79% vs PCLIX's -66.60%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PCLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.