PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AEDNX vs. GABCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AEDNX vs. GABCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Water Island Event-Driven Fund (AEDNX) and Gabelli ABC Fund (GABCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AEDNX having a 3.75% return and GABCX slightly lower at 3.59%. Over the past 10 years, AEDNX has outperformed GABCX with an annualized return of 4.46%, while GABCX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.36% annualized return.


AEDNX

1D
0.38%
1M
1.92%
YTD
3.75%
6M
3.75%
1Y
8.73%
3Y*
7.44%
5Y*
3.47%
10Y*
4.46%

GABCX

1D
0.27%
1M
-0.79%
YTD
3.59%
6M
3.12%
1Y
7.65%
3Y*
5.49%
5Y*
3.59%
10Y*
3.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEDNX vs. GABCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AEDNX
Water Island Event-Driven Fund
3.75%8.67%2.26%5.90%-0.63%1.18%13.42%4.76%-0.15%3.89%
GABCX
Gabelli ABC Fund
3.59%5.86%2.97%6.84%-2.02%4.37%2.90%4.80%0.20%2.20%

Correlation

The correlation between AEDNX and GABCX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2010

0.56

The correlation between AEDNX and GABCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AEDNX vs. GABCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEDNX
AEDNX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
AEDNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEDNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEDNX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
AEDNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEDNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

GABCX
GABCX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
GABCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GABCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
GABCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GABCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
GABCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEDNX vs. GABCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Water Island Event-Driven Fund (AEDNX) and Gabelli ABC Fund (GABCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AEDNXGABCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.80

1.26

+0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.38

2.73

+3.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.98

8.29

+13.68

AEDNX vs. GABCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEDNX Sharpe Ratio is 3.24, which is higher than the GABCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEDNX and GABCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AEDNX vs. GABCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEDNX drawdown since its inception was -13.03%, which is greater than GABCX's maximum drawdown of -10.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEDNX and GABCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AEDNXGABCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.03%

-10.80%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.37%

-2.67%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.79%

-8.67%

+5.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.06%

-8.67%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.24%

-10.80%

-1.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.97%

+0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.70%

-0.94%

-1.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.40%

0.88%

-0.48%

Volatility

AEDNX vs. GABCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Water Island Event-Driven Fund (AEDNX) is 1.24%, while Gabelli ABC Fund (GABCX) has a volatility of 1.63%. This indicates that AEDNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GABCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AEDNXGABCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.24%

1.63%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.39%

3.72%

-1.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71%

4.98%

-2.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.08%

4.80%

-0.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.17%

4.31%

+0.86%

AEDNX vs. GABCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AEDNX has a 1.44% expense ratio, which is higher than GABCX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

AEDNX vs. GABCX - Dividend Comparison

AEDNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than GABCX's 4.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AEDNX
Water Island Event-Driven Fund
0.91%0.95%0.20%0.72%0.00%0.00%0.24%0.46%1.78%0.62%0.00%2.79%
GABCX
Gabelli ABC Fund
4.45%4.61%0.00%3.35%1.38%4.55%0.44%2.95%3.69%0.13%2.37%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


AEDNX and GABCX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GABCX has higher volatility (1.63%) compared to AEDNX (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AEDNX dropped -13.03% vs GABCX's -10.80%.

AEDNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AEDNX and GABCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer