AEDAX vs. BIAHX
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco EQV European Equity Fund (AEDAX) and Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX).
AEDAX is managed by Invesco. It was launched on Nov 2, 1997. BIAHX is managed by Brown Advisory Funds. It was launched on Oct 20, 2013.
Performance
AEDAX vs. BIAHX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AEDAX vs. BIAHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEDAX Invesco EQV European Equity Fund | 3.28% | 23.92% | -0.79% | 19.64% | -21.77% | 14.22% | -0.06% | 24.54% | -18.86% | 26.90% |
BIAHX Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund | -2.69% | 47.26% | 10.85% | 19.36% | -11.95% | 14.54% | 11.34% | 29.43% | -16.60% | 32.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AEDAX achieves a 3.28% return, which is significantly higher than BIAHX's -2.69% return. Over the past 10 years, AEDAX has underperformed BIAHX with an annualized return of 5.55%, while BIAHX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.69% annualized return.
AEDAX
- 1D
- 2.57%
- 1M
- -5.72%
- YTD
- 3.28%
- 6M
- 9.14%
- 1Y
- 21.57%
- 3Y*
- 11.36%
- 5Y*
- 4.71%
- 10Y*
- 5.55%
BIAHX
- 1D
- 2.78%
- 1M
- -6.61%
- YTD
- -2.69%
- 6M
- 0.89%
- 1Y
- 23.54%
- 3Y*
- 19.59%
- 5Y*
- 12.97%
- 10Y*
- 11.69%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AEDAX vs. BIAHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AEDAX has a 1.37% expense ratio, which is higher than BIAHX's 1.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AEDAX vs. BIAHX — Risk / Return Rank
AEDAX
BIAHX
AEDAX vs. BIAHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EQV European Equity Fund (AEDAX) and Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AEDAX | BIAHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.34 | 1.58 | -0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.84 | 2.09 | -0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.31 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 1.74 | +0.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.56 | 6.91 | -0.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AEDAX | BIAHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 1.58 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.81 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.68 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.57 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between AEDAX and BIAHX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AEDAX vs. BIAHX - Dividend Comparison
AEDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.38%, more than BIAHX's 7.81% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEDAX Invesco EQV European Equity Fund | 16.38% | 16.92% | 10.53% | 2.58% | 7.48% | 9.40% | 1.30% | 2.53% | 1.43% | 1.86% | 1.59% | 4.78% |
BIAHX Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund | 7.81% | 7.60% | 5.16% | 1.13% | 2.66% | 9.72% | 6.39% | 9.78% | 12.12% | 0.83% | 1.19% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AEDAX vs. BIAHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AEDAX drawdown since its inception was -60.46%, which is greater than BIAHX's maximum drawdown of -34.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEDAX and BIAHX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AEDAX | BIAHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.46% | -34.90% | -25.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.59% | -13.18% | +2.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.81% | -30.95% | -7.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.03% | -34.90% | -5.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.07% | -10.18% | +2.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.99% | -6.02% | -10.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 3.31% | -0.27% |
Volatility
AEDAX vs. BIAHX - Volatility Comparison
Invesco EQV European Equity Fund (AEDAX) has a higher volatility of 7.51% compared to Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX) at 6.71%. This indicates that AEDAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIAHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AEDAX | BIAHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.51% | 6.71% | +0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.92% | 9.78% | +1.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.57% | 15.19% | +1.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 16.17% | +1.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.37% | 17.19% | +0.18% |