AEDAX vs. BIAHX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AEDAX (Invesco EQV European Equity Fund) and BIAHX (Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund) are both Europe Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, AEDAX returned 6.74%/yr vs 11.67%/yr for BIAHX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AEDAX charges 1.37%/yr vs 1.19%/yr for BIAHX.

Performance

AEDAX vs. BIAHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco EQV European Equity Fund (AEDAX) and Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEDAX achieves a 18.02% return, which is significantly higher than BIAHX's 0.84% return. Over the past 10 years, AEDAX has underperformed BIAHX with an annualized return of 6.74%, while BIAHX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.67% annualized return.

AEDAX

• 1D: 1.27%
• 1M: 8.53%
• YTD: 18.02%
• 6M: 21.99%
• 1Y: 28.94%
• 3Y*: 16.44%
• 5Y*: 6.48%
• 10Y*: 6.74%

BIAHX

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 0.95%
• YTD: 0.84%
• 6M: 3.22%
• 1Y: 11.59%
• 3Y*: 21.36%
• 5Y*: 12.19%
• 10Y*: 11.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEDAX vs. BIAHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AEDAX Invesco EQV European Equity Fund	18.02%	23.92%	-0.79%	19.64%	-21.77%	14.22%	-0.06%	24.54%	-18.86%	26.90%
BIAHX Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund	0.84%	47.26%	10.85%	19.36%	-11.95%	14.54%	11.34%	29.43%	-16.60%	32.37%

Correlation

The correlation between AEDAX and BIAHX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013	0.91

The correlation between AEDAX and BIAHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AEDAX vs. BIAHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEDAX

AEDAX Risk / Return Rank: 43
AEDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
AEDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
AEDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
AEDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
AEDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

BIAHX

BIAHX Risk / Return Rank: 9
BIAHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
BIAHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
BIAHX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
BIAHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
BIAHX Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEDAX vs. BIAHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EQV European Equity Fund (AEDAX) and Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AEDAX	BIAHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	0.80	+1.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.64	1.22	+1.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.15	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.65	0.84	+1.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.28	2.61	+6.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AEDAX vs. BIAHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEDAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is higher than the BIAHX Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEDAX and BIAHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AEDAX	BIAHX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.89	0.80	+1.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37	0.75	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.39	0.68	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.58	-0.10

Drawdowns

AEDAX vs. BIAHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEDAX drawdown since its inception was -60.46%, which is greater than BIAHX's maximum drawdown of -34.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEDAX and BIAHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AEDAX	BIAHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.46%	-34.90%	-25.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.59%	-13.18%	+2.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.80%	-13.18%	-2.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.81%	-30.95%	-7.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.03%	-34.90%	-5.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-6.93%	+6.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.90%	-6.03%	-10.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.01%	4.23%	-1.22%

Volatility

AEDAX vs. BIAHX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco EQV European Equity Fund (AEDAX) and Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX) have volatilities of 4.81% and 4.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AEDAX	BIAHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.81%	4.90%	-0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.93%	11.49%	+0.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.83%	13.93%	+0.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.68%	16.36%	+1.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.47%	17.29%	+0.18%

AEDAX vs. BIAHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AEDAX has a 1.37% expense ratio, which is higher than BIAHX's 1.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

AEDAX vs. BIAHX - Dividend Comparison

AEDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.33%, more than BIAHX's 7.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AEDAX Invesco EQV European Equity Fund	14.33%	16.92%	10.53%	2.58%	7.48%	9.40%	1.30%	2.53%	1.43%	1.86%	1.59%	4.78%
BIAHX Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund	7.54%	7.60%	5.16%	1.13%	2.66%	9.72%	6.39%	9.78%	12.12%	0.83%	1.19%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AEDAX and BIAHX in my portfolio?

AEDAX and BIAHX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AEDAX or BIAHX?

BIAHX has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to AEDAX (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AEDAX dropped -60.46% vs BIAHX's -34.90%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AEDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.