PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AED.BR vs. ACKB.BR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AED.BR vs. ACKB.BR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Aedifica SA (AED.BR) and Ackermans & Van Haaren NV (ACKB.BR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AED.BR achieves a 6.07% return, which is significantly lower than ACKB.BR's 15.20% return. Over the past 10 years, AED.BR has underperformed ACKB.BR with an annualized return of 6.92%, while ACKB.BR has yielded a comparatively higher 10.41% annualized return.


AED.BR

1D
0.52%
1M
-1.58%
YTD
6.07%
6M
10.07%
1Y
8.40%
3Y*
9.18%
5Y*
-2.65%
10Y*
6.92%

ACKB.BR

1D
0.23%
1M
-9.83%
YTD
15.20%
6M
16.82%
1Y
18.05%
3Y*
20.75%
5Y*
16.58%
10Y*
10.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AED.BR vs. ACKB.BR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AED.BR
Aedifica SA
6.07%27.62%-5.87%-8.79%-31.54%19.27%-7.19%60.92%7.43%17.46%
ACKB.BR
Ackermans & Van Haaren NV
15.20%23.85%22.48%1.09%-3.38%39.59%-10.21%7.82%-7.83%11.39%

Correlation

The correlation between AED.BR and ACKB.BR is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2006

0.23

The correlation between AED.BR and ACKB.BR shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.35 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AED.BR vs. ACKB.BR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AED.BR
AED.BR Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
AED.BR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AED.BR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
AED.BR Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
AED.BR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
AED.BR Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

ACKB.BR
ACKB.BR Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ACKB.BR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACKB.BR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACKB.BR Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
ACKB.BR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACKB.BR Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AED.BR vs. ACKB.BR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aedifica SA (AED.BR) and Ackermans & Van Haaren NV (ACKB.BR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AED.BRACKB.BRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.18

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

1.36

-0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.48

3.38

-1.91

AED.BR vs. ACKB.BR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AED.BR Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the ACKB.BR Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AED.BR and ACKB.BR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AED.BRACKB.BRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

0.92

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

0.85

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.52

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.51

-0.13

Drawdowns

AED.BR vs. ACKB.BR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AED.BR drawdown since its inception was -56.99%, smaller than the maximum ACKB.BR drawdown of -67.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AED.BR and ACKB.BR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AED.BRACKB.BRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.99%

-67.40%

+10.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.94%

-13.69%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.69%

-14.39%

-11.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.99%

-27.08%

-29.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.99%

-33.20%

-23.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.45%

-10.31%

-17.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.20%

-14.58%

+0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.04%

5.47%

+0.57%

Volatility

AED.BR vs. ACKB.BR - Volatility Comparison

Aedifica SA (AED.BR) has a higher volatility of 7.21% compared to Ackermans & Van Haaren NV (ACKB.BR) at 5.08%. This indicates that AED.BR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACKB.BR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AED.BRACKB.BRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.21%

5.08%

+2.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.73%

16.36%

-1.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.02%

20.34%

-2.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.17%

19.26%

+4.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.98%

19.68%

+4.30%

Dividends

AED.BR vs. ACKB.BR - Dividend Comparison

AED.BR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, more than ACKB.BR's 1.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACKB.BR
Ackermans & Van Haaren NV
1.75%1.64%1.78%1.95%1.72%1.39%1.89%1.66%1.67%1.41%1.48%1.35%
AED.BR
Aedifica SA
5.92%5.78%6.71%5.97%4.85%1.83%4.03%5.07%6.68%2.86%2.95%7.05%

Financials

AED.BR vs. ACKB.BR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aedifica SA and Ackermans & Van Haaren NV. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in EUR except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AED.BR and ACKB.BR have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AED.BR and ACKB.BR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer