PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADVMX vs. FERGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ADVMX vs. FERGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vaughan Nelson Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (ADVMX) and Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Index Fund (FERGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADVMX achieves a 16.34% return, which is significantly lower than FERGX's 29.40% return.


ADVMX

1D
2.11%
1M
2.77%
YTD
16.34%
6M
18.33%
1Y
50.45%
3Y*
20.23%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*
9.05%

FERGX

1D
3.17%
1M
7.34%
YTD
29.40%
6M
31.34%
1Y
55.09%
3Y*
22.94%
5Y*
8.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADVMX vs. FERGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ADVMX
Vaughan Nelson Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund
16.34%45.69%-2.43%16.20%-11.69%9.81%10.81%7.15%-18.47%25.07%
FERGX
Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Index Fund
29.40%33.86%6.59%9.41%-20.19%-3.05%17.46%18.22%-14.52%33.62%

Correlation

The correlation between ADVMX and FERGX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.87

The correlation between ADVMX and FERGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADVMX vs. FERGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADVMX
ADVMX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
ADVMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADVMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADVMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ADVMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADVMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

FERGX
FERGX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FERGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FERGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FERGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FERGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FERGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADVMX vs. FERGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vaughan Nelson Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (ADVMX) and Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Index Fund (FERGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ADVMXFERGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.52

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.37

4.11

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.76

15.36

-0.61

ADVMX vs. FERGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADVMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the FERGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADVMX and FERGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ADVMX vs. FERGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADVMX drawdown since its inception was -51.17%, which is greater than FERGX's maximum drawdown of -39.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADVMX and FERGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADVMXFERGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.17%

-39.27%

-11.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.40%

-13.32%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.92%

-16.20%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.46%

-36.97%

+12.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-0.26%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.55%

-14.28%

+2.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.36%

3.55%

-0.19%

Volatility

ADVMX vs. FERGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vaughan Nelson Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (ADVMX) is 5.68%, while Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Index Fund (FERGX) has a volatility of 10.91%. This indicates that ADVMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FERGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADVMXFERGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.68%

10.91%

-5.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.59%

18.24%

-2.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.94%

20.21%

-0.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.33%

17.76%

-1.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.17%

18.22%

-2.05%

ADVMX vs. FERGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ADVMX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than FERGX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

ADVMX vs. FERGX - Dividend Comparison

ADVMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.16%, more than FERGX's 2.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADVMX
Vaughan Nelson Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund
9.16%10.65%0.00%0.95%1.13%1.51%1.51%2.84%1.48%3.06%2.18%1.89%
FERGX
Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Index Fund
2.07%2.67%2.40%2.67%2.51%2.90%1.49%2.49%2.58%0.58%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ADVMX and FERGX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FERGX has higher volatility (10.91%) compared to ADVMX (5.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADVMX dropped -51.17% vs FERGX's -39.27%.

FERGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADVMX and FERGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer