ADPV vs. BLCR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ADPV (Adaptiv Select ETF) and BLCR (Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ADPV returned 39.30% vs 47.09% for BLCR. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ADPV charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for BLCR.

Performance

ADPV vs. BLCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Adaptiv Select ETF (ADPV) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADPV achieves a 10.73% return, which is significantly lower than BLCR's 19.56% return.

ADPV

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 6.65%
• YTD: 10.73%
• 6M: 11.05%
• 1Y: 39.30%
• 3Y*: 27.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BLCR

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 6.16%
• YTD: 19.56%
• 6M: 21.53%
• 1Y: 47.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADPV vs. BLCR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ADPV Adaptiv Select ETF	10.73%	21.19%	43.88%	11.47%
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	19.56%	30.93%	17.07%	14.18%

Correlation

The correlation between ADPV and BLCR is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023	0.65

The correlation between ADPV and BLCR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

ADPV vs. BLCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ADPV	BLCR
Energy	23.7%	2.2%
Technology	15.1%	35.7%
Real Estate	11.8%	-
Healthcare	11.6%	7.6%
Basic Materials	11.2%	2.2%
Consumer Cyclical	7.8%	10.9%
Communication Services	7.5%	11.0%
Utilities	7.2%	1.6%
Industrials	7.0%	13.5%
Financial Services	4.2%	12.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	-

Return for Risk

ADPV vs. BLCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADPV

ADPV Risk / Return Rank: 47
ADPV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
ADPV Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
ADPV Omega Ratio Rank: 43
ADPV Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
ADPV Martin Ratio Rank: 50

BLCR

BLCR Risk / Return Rank: 87
BLCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
BLCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
BLCR Omega Ratio Rank: 85
BLCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
BLCR Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADPV vs. BLCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adaptiv Select ETF (ADPV) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ADPV	BLCR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.64	3.05	-1.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	4.02	-1.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.52	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.84	4.61	-1.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.42	21.86	-13.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ADPV vs. BLCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADPV Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is lower than the BLCR Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADPV and BLCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ADPV	BLCR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.64	3.05	-1.41
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.98	1.90	-0.92

Drawdowns

ADPV vs. BLCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADPV drawdown since its inception was -22.30%, roughly equal to the maximum BLCR drawdown of -21.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADPV and BLCR.

Drawdown Indicators

	ADPV	BLCR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.30%	-21.29%	-1.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.88%	-10.26%	-3.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.30%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.37%	+0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.47%	-2.19%	-3.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.68%	2.16%	+2.52%

Volatility

ADPV vs. BLCR - Volatility Comparison

Adaptiv Select ETF (ADPV) has a higher volatility of 5.94% compared to Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR) at 4.45%. This indicates that ADPV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ADPV	BLCR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.94%	4.45%	+1.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.94%	12.24%	+4.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.10%	15.54%	+8.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.84%	17.47%	+3.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.84%	17.47%	+3.37%

ADPV vs. BLCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ADPV has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than BLCR's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

ADPV vs. BLCR - Dividend Comparison

ADPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, more than BLCR's 0.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
ADPV Adaptiv Select ETF	0.63%	0.70%	0.67%	0.22%	0.25%
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	0.23%	0.33%	0.75%	0.13%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ADPV and BLCR in my portfolio?

ADPV and BLCR have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ADPV or BLCR?

ADPV has higher volatility (5.94%) compared to BLCR (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADPV dropped -22.30% vs BLCR's -21.29%.

Which ETF is better, ADPV or BLCR?

On 1-year performance, BLCR leads with 47.09% vs 39.30% for ADPV. On fees, BLCR is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, BLCR has been the lower-risk option at 4.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ADPV or BLCR?

Over the 1-year period, BLCR has performed better with a 47.09% return vs 39.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ADPV or BLCR?

BLCR is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for ADPV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ADPV or BLCR?

ADPV has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.23% for BLCR.

What is the main difference between ADPV and BLCR?

They also come from different issuers: Adaptiv and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for ADPV and 0.36% for BLCR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BLCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.