ADBG vs. ZAP

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

ADBG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF) and ZAP (Global X U.S. Electrification ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ADBG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while ZAP is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the Global X U.S. Electrification Index. ADBG is actively managed, while ZAP is passively managed. Over the past year, ADBG returned -69.16% vs 27.21% for ZAP. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. ADBG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for ZAP.

Performance

ADBG vs. ZAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF (ADBG) and Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADBG achieves a -63.31% return, which is significantly lower than ZAP's 16.86% return.

ADBG

• 1D: 6.23%
• 1M: 25.00%
• 6M: -57.82%
• YTD: -63.31%
• 1Y: -69.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZAP

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 1.43%
• 6M: 14.11%
• YTD: 16.86%
• 1Y: 27.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADBG vs. ZAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ADBG Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF	-63.31%	-29.61%
ZAP Global X U.S. Electrification ETF	16.86%	19.17%

Correlation

The correlation between ADBG and ZAP is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2025	-0.10

The correlation between ADBG and ZAP shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to -0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ADBG vs. ZAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADBG

ADBG Risk / Return Rank: 1
ADBG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
ADBG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
ADBG Omega Ratio Rank: 1
ADBG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
ADBG Martin Ratio Rank: 1

ZAP

ZAP Risk / Return Rank: 69
ZAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
ZAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
ZAP Omega Ratio Rank: 62
ZAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
ZAP Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADBG vs. ZAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF (ADBG) and Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ADBG	ZAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.98	1.76	-2.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.70	2.42	-4.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.80	1.30	-0.50
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.88	3.78	-4.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.51	9.11	-10.62

ADBG vs. ZAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADBG Sharpe Ratio is -0.98, which is lower than the ZAP Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADBG and ZAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ADBG vs. ZAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADBG drawdown since its inception was -84.14%, which is greater than ZAP's maximum drawdown of -12.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADBG and ZAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	ADBG	ZAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.14%	-12.38%	-71.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-78.97%	-7.23%	-71.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-77.72%	-3.35%	-74.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.55%	-2.58%	-41.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	45.66%	3.00%	+42.66%

Volatility

ADBG vs. ZAP - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF (ADBG) has a higher volatility of 28.99% compared to Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP) at 4.46%. This indicates that ADBG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ADBG	ZAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	28.99%	4.46%	+24.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	61.05%	12.07%	+48.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	70.76%	15.53%	+55.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	69.07%	16.81%	+52.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	69.07%	16.81%	+52.26%

ADBG vs. ZAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ADBG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ZAP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

ADBG vs. ZAP - Dividend Comparison

ADBG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ADBG Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ZAP Global X U.S. Electrification ETF	1.61%	1.81%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ADBG and ZAP in my portfolio?

ADBG and ZAP have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ADBG or ZAP?

ADBG has higher volatility (28.99%) compared to ZAP (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADBG dropped -84.14% vs ZAP's -12.38%.

Which ETF is better, ADBG or ZAP?

On 1-year performance, ZAP leads with 27.21% vs -69.16% for ADBG. On fees, ZAP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, ZAP has been the lower-risk option at 4.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ADBG or ZAP?

Over the 1-year period, ZAP has performed better with a 27.21% return vs -69.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ADBG or ZAP?

ZAP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ADBG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ADBG or ZAP?

ZAP has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.00% for ADBG.

What is the main difference between ADBG and ZAP?

ADBG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ZAP is Utilities Equities. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ADBG and 0.50% for ZAP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ZAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.