ACWI.L vs. SXLE.L
ACWI.L (SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF) and SXLE.L (State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACWI.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while SXLE.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Energy Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ACWI.L returned 13.66%/yr vs 10.75%/yr for SXLE.L. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ACWI.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SXLE.L.
Performance
ACWI.L vs. SXLE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ACWI.L is traded in GBP, while SXLE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SXLE.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACWI.L achieves a 11.87% return, which is significantly lower than SXLE.L's 31.37% return. Over the past 10 years, ACWI.L has outperformed SXLE.L with an annualized return of 13.66%, while SXLE.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.75% annualized return.
ACWI.L
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 5.83%
- YTD
- 11.87%
- 6M
- 12.47%
- 1Y
- 30.54%
- 3Y*
- 18.34%
- 5Y*
- 12.53%
- 10Y*
- 13.66%
SXLE.L
- 1D
- 2.54%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- 31.37%
- 6M
- 29.66%
- 1Y
- 45.51%
- 3Y*
- 14.48%
- 5Y*
- 21.57%
- 10Y*
- 10.75%
ACWI.L vs. SXLE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWI.L SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF | 11.87% | 14.32% | 19.66% | 15.59% | -8.59% | 20.28% | 11.89% | 21.92% | -4.58% | 12.93% |
SXLE.L State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF | 31.37% | 1.92% | 5.56% | -4.41% | 82.11% | 52.20% | -33.89% | 5.04% | -13.28% | -9.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACWI.L and SXLE.L is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2015 | 0.46 |
The correlation between ACWI.L and SXLE.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ACWI.L vs. SXLE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ACWI.L
SXLE.L
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
ACWI.L
SXLE.L
-
Financial Services
ACWI.L
SXLE.L
-
Industrials
ACWI.L
SXLE.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
ACWI.L
SXLE.L
-
Communication Services
ACWI.L
SXLE.L
-
Healthcare
ACWI.L
SXLE.L
-
Consumer Defensive
ACWI.L
SXLE.L
-
Energy
ACWI.L
SXLE.L
Basic Materials
ACWI.L
SXLE.L
-
Utilities
ACWI.L
SXLE.L
-
Real Estate
ACWI.L
SXLE.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACWI.L vs. SXLE.L — Risk / Return Rank
ACWI.L
SXLE.L
ACWI.L vs. SXLE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (ACWI.L) and State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACWI.L | SXLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.34 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.31 | 2.72 | +1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.47 | 8.48 | +8.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACWI.L | SXLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.92 | 1.95 | +0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 0.81 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 | 0.38 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.40 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
ACWI.L vs. SXLE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACWI.L drawdown since its inception was -25.44%, smaller than the maximum SXLE.L drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWI.L and SXLE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACWI.L | SXLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.44% | -62.09% | +36.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.05% | -16.65% | +9.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.07% | -23.84% | +5.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.07% | -23.84% | +5.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.44% | -62.09% | +36.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -8.84% | +8.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.67% | -15.52% | +11.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | 5.35% | -3.61% |
Volatility
ACWI.L vs. SXLE.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (ACWI.L) is 2.89%, while State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L) has a volatility of 8.79%. This indicates that ACWI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SXLE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACWI.L | SXLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.89% | 8.79% | -5.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.76% | 19.51% | -11.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.45% | 23.29% | -12.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.05% | 26.53% | -13.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.39% | 28.36% | -13.97% |
ACWI.L vs. SXLE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACWI.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SXLE.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACWI.L vs. SXLE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ACWI.L nor SXLE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ACWI.L and SXLE.L have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SXLE.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SXLE.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for ACWI.L.
ACWI.L is categorized as Global Equities, while SXLE.L is Energy Equities. ACWI.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while SXLE.L tracks S&P Energy Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for ACWI.L and 0.15% for SXLE.L.
Find the right allocation for ACWI.L and SXLE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer