PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACWI.L vs. SXLE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACWI.L vs. SXLE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (ACWI.L) and State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ACWI.L is traded in GBP, while SXLE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SXLE.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACWI.L achieves a 11.87% return, which is significantly lower than SXLE.L's 31.37% return. Over the past 10 years, ACWI.L has outperformed SXLE.L with an annualized return of 13.66%, while SXLE.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.75% annualized return.


ACWI.L

1D
-0.37%
1M
5.83%
YTD
11.87%
6M
12.47%
1Y
30.54%
3Y*
18.34%
5Y*
12.53%
10Y*
13.66%

SXLE.L

1D
2.54%
1M
1.21%
YTD
31.37%
6M
29.66%
1Y
45.51%
3Y*
14.48%
5Y*
21.57%
10Y*
10.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACWI.L vs. SXLE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACWI.L
SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF
11.87%14.32%19.66%15.59%-8.59%20.28%11.89%21.92%-4.58%12.93%
SXLE.L
State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF
31.37%1.92%5.56%-4.41%82.11%52.20%-33.89%5.04%-13.28%-9.73%

Correlation

The correlation between ACWI.L and SXLE.L is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2015

0.46

The correlation between ACWI.L and SXLE.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ACWI.L vs. SXLE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ACWI.L
SXLE.L

Technology

29.2%

-

Financial Services

16.5%

-

Industrials

10.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%

-

Communication Services

9.0%

-

Healthcare

8.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

4.3%
100.0%

Basic Materials

3.6%

-

Utilities

2.7%

-

Real Estate

1.7%

-

Technology

ACWI.L
29.2%
SXLE.L

-

Financial Services

ACWI.L
16.5%
SXLE.L

-

Industrials

ACWI.L
10.9%
SXLE.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

ACWI.L
9.3%
SXLE.L

-

Communication Services

ACWI.L
9.0%
SXLE.L

-

Healthcare

ACWI.L
8.0%
SXLE.L

-

Consumer Defensive

ACWI.L
4.9%
SXLE.L

-

Energy

ACWI.L
4.3%
SXLE.L
100.0%

Basic Materials

ACWI.L
3.6%
SXLE.L

-

Utilities

ACWI.L
2.7%
SXLE.L

-

Real Estate

ACWI.L
1.7%
SXLE.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACWI.L vs. SXLE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACWI.L
ACWI.L Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
ACWI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

SXLE.L
SXLE.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SXLE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXLE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXLE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SXLE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXLE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACWI.L vs. SXLE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (ACWI.L) and State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACWI.LSXLE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.34

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.31

2.72

+1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.47

8.48

+8.99

ACWI.L vs. SXLE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACWI.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is higher than the SXLE.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACWI.L and SXLE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACWI.LSXLE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.92

1.95

+0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

0.81

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

0.38

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.40

+0.41

Drawdowns

ACWI.L vs. SXLE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACWI.L drawdown since its inception was -25.44%, smaller than the maximum SXLE.L drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWI.L and SXLE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACWI.LSXLE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.44%

-62.09%

+36.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.05%

-16.65%

+9.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.07%

-23.84%

+5.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.07%

-23.84%

+5.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.44%

-62.09%

+36.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-8.84%

+8.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.67%

-15.52%

+11.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

5.35%

-3.61%

Volatility

ACWI.L vs. SXLE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (ACWI.L) is 2.89%, while State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L) has a volatility of 8.79%. This indicates that ACWI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SXLE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACWI.LSXLE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.89%

8.79%

-5.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.76%

19.51%

-11.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.45%

23.29%

-12.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.05%

26.53%

-13.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.39%

28.36%

-13.97%

ACWI.L vs. SXLE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACWI.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SXLE.L's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACWI.L vs. SXLE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ACWI.L nor SXLE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ACWI.L and SXLE.L have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SXLE.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SXLE.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for ACWI.L.

ACWI.L is categorized as Global Equities, while SXLE.L is Energy Equities. ACWI.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while SXLE.L tracks S&P Energy Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for ACWI.L and 0.15% for SXLE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACWI.L and SXLE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer