PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACWDX vs. SKSEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACWDX vs. SKSEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (ACWDX) and AMG GW&K Small Cap Value Fund (SKSEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACWDX achieves a 14.29% return, which is significantly lower than SKSEX's 18.45% return. Over the past 10 years, ACWDX has outperformed SKSEX with an annualized return of 10.60%, while SKSEX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.24% annualized return.


ACWDX

1D
1.28%
1M
3.89%
YTD
14.29%
6M
1.86%
1Y
20.80%
3Y*
12.69%
5Y*
5.57%
10Y*
10.60%

SKSEX

1D
1.35%
1M
1.96%
YTD
18.45%
6M
9.06%
1Y
24.36%
3Y*
12.53%
5Y*
5.89%
10Y*
9.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACWDX vs. SKSEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACWDX
AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund
14.29%0.29%9.27%21.13%-22.32%12.52%45.63%20.24%-5.14%18.69%
SKSEX
AMG GW&K Small Cap Value Fund
18.45%-4.50%10.60%17.49%-15.36%33.22%3.30%38.26%-18.98%8.39%

Correlation

The correlation between ACWDX and SKSEX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2010

0.84

The correlation between ACWDX and SKSEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACWDX vs. SKSEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACWDX
ACWDX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
ACWDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

SKSEX
SKSEX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
SKSEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SKSEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
SKSEX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
SKSEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
SKSEX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACWDX vs. SKSEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (ACWDX) and AMG GW&K Small Cap Value Fund (SKSEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACWDXSKSEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.26

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

2.45

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.11

6.82

-2.71

ACWDX vs. SKSEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACWDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is comparable to the SKSEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACWDX and SKSEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACWDXSKSEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

1.36

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.28

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.38

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.60

-0.15

Drawdowns

ACWDX vs. SKSEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACWDX drawdown since its inception was -38.86%, smaller than the maximum SKSEX drawdown of -65.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWDX and SKSEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACWDXSKSEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.86%

-65.26%

+26.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.99%

-10.83%

-4.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.64%

-26.39%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.74%

-26.39%

-6.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.86%

-49.36%

+10.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-1.52%

+1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.05%

-9.23%

-0.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.52%

3.87%

+1.65%

Volatility

ACWDX vs. SKSEX - Volatility Comparison

AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (ACWDX) has a higher volatility of 5.94% compared to AMG GW&K Small Cap Value Fund (SKSEX) at 5.32%. This indicates that ACWDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SKSEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACWDXSKSEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.94%

5.32%

+0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.06%

15.67%

+2.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.37%

19.53%

+1.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.94%

21.47%

+0.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.39%

24.50%

-1.11%

ACWDX vs. SKSEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACWDX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SKSEX's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACWDX vs. SKSEX - Dividend Comparison

Neither ACWDX nor SKSEX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWDX
AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.74%0.00%2.04%58.27%4.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.02%
SKSEX
AMG GW&K Small Cap Value Fund
0.00%0.00%8.62%1.51%1.69%13.94%43.15%13.91%14.98%6.75%0.02%4.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACWDX and SKSEX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACWDX has higher volatility (5.94%) compared to SKSEX (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACWDX dropped -38.86% vs SKSEX's -65.26%.

SKSEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACWDX and SKSEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer