ACWDX vs. ARSMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ACWDX (AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund) and ARSMX (AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund) are both mutual funds - ACWDX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by AMG, while ARSMX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by AMG. Over the past 10 years, ACWDX returned 10.60%/yr vs 9.26%/yr for ARSMX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACWDX charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.27%/yr for ARSMX.

Performance

ACWDX vs. ARSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (ACWDX) and AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACWDX achieves a 14.29% return, which is significantly higher than ARSMX's -0.63% return. Over the past 10 years, ACWDX has outperformed ARSMX with an annualized return of 10.60%, while ARSMX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.26% annualized return.

ACWDX

• 1D: 1.28%
• 1M: 3.89%
• YTD: 14.29%
• 6M: 1.86%
• 1Y: 20.80%
• 3Y*: 12.69%
• 5Y*: 5.57%
• 10Y*: 10.60%

ARSMX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.56%
• YTD: -0.63%
• 6M: -5.58%
• 1Y: 0.32%
• 3Y*: 8.37%
• 5Y*: 3.61%
• 10Y*: 9.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACWDX vs. ARSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ACWDX AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund	14.29%	0.29%	9.27%	21.13%	-22.32%	12.52%	45.63%	20.24%	-5.14%	18.69%
ARSMX AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund	-0.63%	-0.83%	12.42%	14.48%	-8.62%	23.41%	1.71%	34.82%	-6.44%	15.26%

Correlation

The correlation between ACWDX and ARSMX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2010	0.83

The correlation between ACWDX and ARSMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ACWDX vs. ARSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACWDX

ACWDX Risk / Return Rank: 15
ACWDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
ACWDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
ACWDX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
ACWDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
ACWDX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

ARSMX

ARSMX Risk / Return Rank: 3
ARSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
ARSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
ARSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
ARSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
ARSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACWDX vs. ARSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (ACWDX) and AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ACWDX	ARSMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.07	0.11	+0.96
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.43	0.25	+1.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.03	+0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.52	0.15	+1.38
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.11	0.35	+3.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ACWDX vs. ARSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACWDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is higher than the ARSMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACWDX and ARSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACWDX	ARSMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.07	0.11	+0.96
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26	0.20	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	0.48	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.35	+0.10

Drawdowns

ACWDX vs. ARSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACWDX drawdown since its inception was -38.86%, smaller than the maximum ARSMX drawdown of -51.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWDX and ARSMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACWDX	ARSMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.86%	-51.75%	+12.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.99%	-10.37%	-4.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.64%	-19.34%	-7.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.74%	-19.34%	-13.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.86%	-42.96%	+4.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.40%	-8.08%	+7.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.05%	-8.11%	-1.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.52%	4.34%	+1.18%

Volatility

ACWDX vs. ARSMX - Volatility Comparison

AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (ACWDX) has a higher volatility of 5.94% compared to AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX) at 2.96%. This indicates that ACWDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACWDX	ARSMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.94%	2.96%	+2.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.06%	10.18%	+7.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.37%	14.38%	+6.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.94%	17.78%	+4.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.39%	19.58%	+3.81%

ACWDX vs. ARSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACWDX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than ARSMX's 1.27% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACWDX vs. ARSMX - Dividend Comparison

Neither ACWDX nor ARSMX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACWDX AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.74%	0.00%	2.04%	58.27%	4.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.02%
ARSMX AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund	0.00%	0.00%	9.27%	3.89%	4.85%	5.86%	0.00%	3.60%	8.60%	15.66%	8.03%	17.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACWDX and ARSMX in my portfolio?

ACWDX and ARSMX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ACWDX or ARSMX?

ACWDX has higher volatility (5.94%) compared to ARSMX (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACWDX dropped -38.86% vs ARSMX's -51.75%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACWDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.