ACVU vs. DFUV
ACVU (Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF) and DFUV (Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ACVU returned 23.84% vs 34.65% for DFUV. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACVU charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for DFUV.
Performance
ACVU vs. DFUV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACVU achieves a 11.06% return, which is significantly lower than DFUV's 16.95% return.
ACVU
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 4.09%
- YTD
- 11.06%
- 6M
- 12.40%
- 1Y
- 23.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFUV
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- 16.95%
- 6M
- 18.53%
- 1Y
- 34.65%
- 3Y*
- 19.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACVU vs. DFUV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ACVU Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF | 11.06% | 14.54% | 9.83% | 8.32% |
DFUV Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF | 16.95% | 15.77% | 11.79% | 10.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACVU and DFUV is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2023 | 0.91 |
The correlation between ACVU and DFUV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
ACVU vs. DFUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ACVU
DFUV
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
ACVU
DFUV
Technology
ACVU
DFUV
Industrials
ACVU
DFUV
Healthcare
ACVU
DFUV
Communication Services
ACVU
DFUV
Consumer Defensive
ACVU
DFUV
Energy
ACVU
DFUV
Consumer Cyclical
ACVU
DFUV
Utilities
ACVU
DFUV
Real Estate
ACVU
DFUV
Basic Materials
ACVU
DFUV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACVU vs. DFUV — Risk / Return Rank
ACVU
DFUV
ACVU vs. DFUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF (ACVU) and Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACVU | DFUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.52 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | 5.80 | -2.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.13 | 21.03 | -8.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACVU | DFUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 2.96 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.40 | 0.90 | +0.50 |
Drawdowns
ACVU vs. DFUV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACVU drawdown since its inception was -13.11%, smaller than the maximum DFUV drawdown of -17.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACVU and DFUV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACVU | DFUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.11% | -17.60% | +4.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.56% | -6.01% | -1.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -0.11% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.97% | -3.65% | +1.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 1.65% | +0.32% |
Volatility
ACVU vs. DFUV - Volatility Comparison
Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF (ACVU) has a higher volatility of 3.28% compared to Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV) at 3.11%. This indicates that ACVU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACVU | DFUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.28% | 3.11% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.22% | 8.47% | -0.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.93% | 11.80% | -0.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.30% | 16.24% | -3.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.30% | 16.24% | -3.94% |
ACVU vs. DFUV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACVU has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than DFUV's 0.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACVU vs. DFUV - Dividend Comparison
ACVU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, more than DFUV's 1.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACVU Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF | 1.77% | 1.97% | 3.91% | 2.87% | 0.00% |
DFUV Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF | 1.35% | 1.55% | 1.64% | 1.72% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, ACVU and DFUV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ACVU has higher volatility (3.28%) compared to DFUV (3.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACVU dropped -13.11% vs DFUV's -17.60%.
On 1-year performance, DFUV leads with 34.65% vs 23.84% for ACVU. On fees, DFUV is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, DFUV has been the lower-risk option at 3.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DFUV has performed better with a 34.65% return vs 23.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFUV is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ACVU.
ACVU has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 1.35% for DFUV.
They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ACVU and 0.21% for DFUV.
DFUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACVU and DFUV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer