ACVT vs. SBIT

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

ACVT (Advent Convertible Bond ETF) and SBIT (Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACVT is a Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by Advent, while SBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). ACVT is actively managed, while SBIT is passively managed. Over the past year, ACVT returned 8.55% vs 124.12% for SBIT. At a correlation of -0.44, they often move in opposite directions. ACVT charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SBIT.

Performance

ACVT vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Advent Convertible Bond ETF (ACVT) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACVT achieves a 5.71% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 44.00% return.

ACVT

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 1.19%
• 6M: 4.46%
• YTD: 5.71%
• 1Y: 8.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SBIT

• 1D: 5.38%
• 1M: 1.44%
• 6M: 58.27%
• YTD: 44.00%
• 1Y: 124.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACVT vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ACVT Advent Convertible Bond ETF	5.71%	8.04%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	44.00%	-2.95%

Correlation

The correlation between ACVT and SBIT is -0.45, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2025	-0.44

Return for Risk

ACVT vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACVT

ACVT Risk / Return Rank: 51
ACVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
ACVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
ACVT Omega Ratio Rank: 52
ACVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
ACVT Martin Ratio Rank: 48

SBIT

SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 52
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 48
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACVT vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Advent Convertible Bond ETF (ACVT) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ACVT	SBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	1.41	+0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	2.05	+0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.25	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.78	2.60	-0.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.38	5.92	+0.45

ACVT vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACVT Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACVT and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ACVT vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACVT drawdown since its inception was -4.81%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACVT and SBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACVT	SBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.81%	-91.35%	+86.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.81%	-47.94%	+43.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	-77.15%	+76.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.82%	-68.83%	+68.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.34%	21.04%	-19.70%

Volatility

ACVT vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Advent Convertible Bond ETF (ACVT) is 1.73%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 22.98%. This indicates that ACVT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACVT	SBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.73%	22.98%	-21.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.79%	68.89%	-64.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.83%	88.51%	-82.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.78%	96.89%	-91.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.78%	96.89%	-91.11%

ACVT vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACVT has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACVT vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

ACVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than SBIT's 3.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ACVT Advent Convertible Bond ETF	1.58%	1.19%	0.00%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	3.97%	0.52%	1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACVT and SBIT in my portfolio?

ACVT and SBIT have a correlation of -0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ACVT or SBIT?

SBIT has higher volatility (22.98%) compared to ACVT (1.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACVT dropped -4.81% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

Which ETF is better, ACVT or SBIT?

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 124.12% vs 8.55% for ACVT. On fees, ACVT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, ACVT has been the lower-risk option at 1.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ACVT or SBIT?

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 124.12% return vs 8.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACVT or SBIT?

ACVT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACVT or SBIT?

SBIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.97%, compared with 1.58% for ACVT.

What is the main difference between ACVT and SBIT?

ACVT is categorized as Convertible Bonds, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Advent and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ACVT and 0.95% for SBIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.