ACVT vs. BMAX
ACVT (Advent Convertible Bond ETF) and BMAX (REX Bitcoin Corporate Treasury Convertible Bond ETF) are both Convertible Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ACVT charges 0.65%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for BMAX.
Performance
ACVT vs. BMAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ACVT
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 2.44%
- YTD
- 5.06%
- 6M
- 5.31%
- 1Y
- 10.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BMAX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACVT vs. BMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ACVT Advent Convertible Bond ETF | 5.06% | 8.11% |
BMAX REX Bitcoin Corporate Treasury Convertible Bond ETF | 4.03% | -20.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACVT and BMAX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2025 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACVT vs. BMAX — Risk / Return Rank
ACVT
BMAX
ACVT vs. BMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Advent Convertible Bond ETF (ACVT) and REX Bitcoin Corporate Treasury Convertible Bond ETF (BMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACVT | BMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.41 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACVT | BMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.17 | — | — |
Drawdowns
ACVT vs. BMAX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACVT | BMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.09% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.79% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.28% | — | — |
Volatility
ACVT vs. BMAX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACVT | BMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.11% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.51% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.66% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.73% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.73% | — | — |
ACVT vs. BMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACVT has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BMAX's 1.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACVT vs. BMAX - Dividend Comparison
ACVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, while BMAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ACVT Advent Convertible Bond ETF | 1.64% | 1.19% |
BMAX REX Bitcoin Corporate Treasury Convertible Bond ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACVT and BMAX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACVT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACVT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for BMAX.
ACVT has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.00% for BMAX.
They also come from different issuers: Advent and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ACVT and 1.14% for BMAX.
Find the right allocation for ACVT and BMAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer