PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACVT vs. BMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACVT vs. BMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Advent Convertible Bond ETF (ACVT) and REX Bitcoin Corporate Treasury Convertible Bond ETF (BMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ACVT

1D
-0.88%
1M
2.44%
YTD
5.06%
6M
5.31%
1Y
10.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BMAX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACVT vs. BMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ACVT and BMAX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2025

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACVT vs. BMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACVT
ACVT Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
ACVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACVT Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
ACVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACVT Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

BMAX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACVT vs. BMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Advent Convertible Bond ETF (ACVT) and REX Bitcoin Corporate Treasury Convertible Bond ETF (BMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACVTBMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.41

ACVT vs. BMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACVTBMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.17

Drawdowns

ACVT vs. BMAX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACVTBMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.28%

Volatility

ACVT vs. BMAX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACVTBMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.73%

ACVT vs. BMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACVT has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BMAX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACVT vs. BMAX - Dividend Comparison

ACVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, while BMAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


ACVT and BMAX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ACVT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ACVT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for BMAX.

ACVT has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.00% for BMAX.

They also come from different issuers: Advent and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ACVT and 1.14% for BMAX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACVT and BMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer