PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACTV vs. LENS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACTV vs. LENS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LeaderShares Activist Leaders ETF (ACTV) and Sarmaya Thematic ETF (LENS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ACTV

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LENS

1D
-1.54%
1M
-1.68%
YTD
13.33%
6M
18.33%
1Y
61.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACTV vs. LENS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ACTV
LeaderShares Activist Leaders ETF
0.00%2.65%
LENS
Sarmaya Thematic ETF
13.33%56.21%

Correlation

The correlation between ACTV and LENS is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2025

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACTV vs. LENS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACTV

LENS
LENS Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
LENS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LENS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
LENS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
LENS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
LENS Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACTV vs. LENS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LeaderShares Activist Leaders ETF (ACTV) and Sarmaya Thematic ETF (LENS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ACTV vs. LENS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACTVLENSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.09

Drawdowns

ACTV vs. LENS - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACTVLENSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.19%

Volatility

ACTV vs. LENS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACTVLENSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.49%

ACTV vs. LENS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACTV has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than LENS's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACTV vs. LENS - Dividend Comparison

ACTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than LENS's 1.41% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ACTV
LeaderShares Activist Leaders ETF
1.28%1.28%0.80%1.18%0.28%7.63%0.11%
LENS
Sarmaya Thematic ETF
1.41%1.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACTV and LENS have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ACTV is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ACTV is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for LENS.

LENS has the higher dividend yield at 1.41%, compared with 1.28% for ACTV.

They also come from different issuers: Redwood and Sarmaya Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ACTV and 0.79% for LENS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACTV and LENS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer