ACTV vs. GSWO
ACTV (LeaderShares Activist Leaders ETF) and GSWO (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF) are both Global Equities funds. ACTV is actively managed, while GSWO is passively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACTV charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for GSWO.
Performance
ACTV vs. GSWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ACTV
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSWO
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 4.49%
- YTD
- 11.60%
- 6M
- 12.29%
- 1Y
- 20.94%
- 3Y*
- 19.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACTV vs. GSWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACTV LeaderShares Activist Leaders ETF | 0.00% | 3.13% | -1.70% | 15.22% | -17.27% |
GSWO Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF | 11.60% | 18.97% | 15.29% | 16.28% | -6.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACTV and GSWO is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2022 | 0.69 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ACTV and GSWO has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACTV vs. GSWO — Risk / Return Rank
ACTV
GSWO
ACTV vs. GSWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LeaderShares Activist Leaders ETF (ACTV) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF (GSWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACTV | GSWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.95 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 1.00 | — |
Drawdowns
ACTV vs. GSWO - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACTV | GSWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -17.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.19% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -3.25% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.86% | — |
Volatility
ACTV vs. GSWO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACTV | GSWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.17% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.03% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 10.76% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 12.96% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 12.96% | — |
ACTV vs. GSWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACTV has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GSWO's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACTV vs. GSWO - Dividend Comparison
ACTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than GSWO's 1.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACTV LeaderShares Activist Leaders ETF | 1.28% | 1.28% | 0.80% | 1.18% | 0.28% | 7.63% | 0.11% |
GSWO Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF | 1.60% | 1.74% | 1.75% | 2.06% | 1.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACTV and GSWO have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GSWO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GSWO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ACTV.
GSWO has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 1.28% for ACTV.
They also come from different issuers: Redwood and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ACTV and 0.25% for GSWO.
Find the right allocation for ACTV and GSWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer