ACSTX vs. FALGX
ACSTX (Invesco Comstock Fund) and FALGX (Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, ACSTX returned 13.17%/yr vs 13.17%/yr for FALGX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACSTX charges 0.80%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for FALGX.
Performance
ACSTX vs. FALGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: ACSTX at 13.17% and FALGX at 13.17%.
ACSTX
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- 10.38%
- 6M
- 9.91%
- 1Y
- 22.73%
- 3Y*
- 18.22%
- 5Y*
- 12.90%
- 10Y*
- 13.17%
FALGX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 10.22%
- 3Y*
- 15.55%
- 5Y*
- 11.39%
- 10Y*
- 13.17%
ACSTX vs. FALGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACSTX Invesco Comstock Fund | 10.38% | 17.22% | 15.00% | 12.37% | 0.74% | 33.33% | -0.78% | 24.35% | -12.34% | 17.75% |
FALGX Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M | 0.00% | 19.09% | 18.68% | 22.88% | -8.40% | 25.20% | 8.27% | 31.01% | -8.88% | 16.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACSTX and FALGX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 1996 | 0.88 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ACSTX and FALGX has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACSTX vs. FALGX — Risk / Return Rank
ACSTX
FALGX
ACSTX vs. FALGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Comstock Fund (ACSTX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M (FALGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACSTX | FALGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.46 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | 2.54 | +0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.28 | 4.12 | +7.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACSTX vs. FALGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACSTX drawdown since its inception was -58.61%, smaller than the maximum FALGX drawdown of -64.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACSTX and FALGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACSTX | FALGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.61% | -64.07% | +5.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.02% | -5.06% | -2.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.61% | -21.78% | +6.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.25% | -21.78% | +4.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.80% | -37.58% | -7.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.79% | -4.20% | +3.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.34% | -14.41% | +5.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.11% | 2.92% | -0.81% |
Volatility
ACSTX vs. FALGX - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Comstock Fund (ACSTX) has a higher volatility of 3.28% compared to Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M (FALGX) at 0.00%. This indicates that ACSTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FALGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACSTX | FALGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.28% | 0.00% | +3.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.24% | 3.52% | +4.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.08% | 7.81% | +3.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.36% | 16.62% | -1.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.46% | 18.66% | +0.80% |
ACSTX vs. FALGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACSTX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than FALGX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACSTX vs. FALGX - Dividend Comparison
ACSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.01%, more than FALGX's 5.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACSTX Invesco Comstock Fund | 8.01% | 8.79% | 10.17% | 8.44% | 13.00% | 8.66% | 2.05% | 6.66% | 10.03% | 3.60% | 6.98% | 1.10% |
FALGX Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M | 5.76% | 5.76% | 0.00% | 3.20% | 1.91% | 6.44% | 5.25% | 8.39% | 16.99% | 6.42% | 1.85% | 2.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACSTX and FALGX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACSTX has higher volatility (3.28%) compared to FALGX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACSTX dropped -58.61% vs FALGX's -64.07%.
ACSTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACSTX and FALGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer