PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACSG vs. MUSI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACSG vs. MUSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF (ACSG) and American Century Multisector Income ETF (MUSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACSG achieves a 11.29% return, which is significantly higher than MUSI's 0.32% return.


ACSG

1D
-3.92%
1M
-2.71%
YTD
11.29%
6M
9.65%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MUSI

1D
-0.44%
1M
-0.58%
YTD
0.32%
6M
0.74%
1Y
5.43%
3Y*
6.21%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACSG vs. MUSI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ACSG and MUSI is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2025

0.55

ACSG vs. MUSI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ACSG
MUSI

Industrials

23.4%

-

Healthcare

22.7%
22.1%

Technology

22.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%

-

Financial Services

7.6%

-

Basic Materials

3.9%

-

Energy

3.1%

-

Communication Services

2.2%

-

Real Estate

2.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.0%

-

Utilities

1.7%
77.9%

Industrials

ACSG
23.4%
MUSI

-

Healthcare

ACSG
22.7%
MUSI
22.1%

Technology

ACSG
22.0%
MUSI

-

Consumer Cyclical

ACSG
9.1%
MUSI

-

Financial Services

ACSG
7.6%
MUSI

-

Basic Materials

ACSG
3.9%
MUSI

-

Energy

ACSG
3.1%
MUSI

-

Communication Services

ACSG
2.2%
MUSI

-

Real Estate

ACSG
2.2%
MUSI

-

Consumer Defensive

ACSG
2.0%
MUSI

-

Utilities

ACSG
1.7%
MUSI
77.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACSG vs. MUSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACSG

MUSI
MUSI Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
MUSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUSI Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MUSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUSI Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACSG vs. MUSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF (ACSG) and American Century Multisector Income ETF (MUSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ACSG vs. MUSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACSGMUSIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.44

+0.48

Drawdowns

ACSG vs. MUSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACSG drawdown since its inception was -13.28%, roughly equal to the maximum MUSI drawdown of -13.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACSG and MUSI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACSGMUSIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.28%

-13.91%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.12%

-1.41%

-2.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.01%

-4.22%

+1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

Volatility

ACSG vs. MUSI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACSGMUSIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.55%

3.34%

+19.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.55%

4.85%

+17.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.55%

4.85%

+17.70%

ACSG vs. MUSI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACSG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than MUSI's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACSG vs. MUSI - Dividend Comparison

ACSG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MUSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.56%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
ACSG
American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MUSI
American Century Multisector Income ETF
5.56%5.74%6.00%5.20%4.02%1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACSG and MUSI have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MUSI is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MUSI is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ACSG.

MUSI has the higher dividend yield at 5.56%, compared with 0.00% for ACSG.

ACSG is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while MUSI is Multisector Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ACSG and 0.36% for MUSI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACSG and MUSI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer