ACMDX vs. UPAAX
ACMDX (Absolute Capital Defender Fund) and UPAAX (Upright Assets Allocation Plus Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. At a correlation of -0.50, they often move in opposite directions. ACMDX charges 2.70%/yr vs 2.49%/yr for UPAAX.
Performance
ACMDX vs. UPAAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ACMDX
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 2.94%
- YTD
- 5.76%
- 6M
- 5.86%
- 1Y
- 13.51%
- 3Y*
- 9.71%
- 5Y*
- 3.96%
- 10Y*
- 4.60%
UPAAX
- 1D
- 2.35%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACMDX vs. UPAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ACMDX Absolute Capital Defender Fund | 0.43% |
UPAAX Upright Assets Allocation Plus Fund | 3.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACMDX and UPAAX is -0.50, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | -0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACMDX vs. UPAAX — Risk / Return Rank
ACMDX
UPAAX
ACMDX vs. UPAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Absolute Capital Defender Fund (ACMDX) and Upright Assets Allocation Plus Fund (UPAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACMDX | UPAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.11 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACMDX | UPAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 132.47 | -132.01 |
Drawdowns
ACMDX vs. UPAAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACMDX drawdown since its inception was -17.63%, which is greater than UPAAX's maximum drawdown of -0.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACMDX and UPAAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACMDX | UPAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.63% | -0.25% | -17.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.18% | -0.08% | -5.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.15% | — | — |
Volatility
ACMDX vs. UPAAX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACMDX | UPAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.63% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.69% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.81% | 21.58% | -14.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.61% | 21.58% | -12.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.82% | 21.58% | -12.76% |
ACMDX vs. UPAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACMDX has a 2.70% expense ratio, which is higher than UPAAX's 2.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACMDX vs. UPAAX - Dividend Comparison
ACMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, while UPAAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACMDX Absolute Capital Defender Fund | 3.12% | 3.30% | 3.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.87% | 2.67% | 0.67% |
UPAAX Upright Assets Allocation Plus Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACMDX and UPAAX have a correlation of -0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ACMDX and UPAAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer