ACLT.DE vs. JPGL.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ACLT.DE (AXA IM ACT Climate Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc) and JPGL.DE (JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating) are both Global Equities funds - ACLT.DE tracks the AXA IM ACT Climate Equity while JPGL.DE tracks the JP Morgan Diversified Factor Global Developed (Region Aware) Equity. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ACLT.DE returned 16.81%/yr vs 13.57%/yr for JPGL.DE. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACLT.DE charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for JPGL.DE.

Performance

ACLT.DE vs. JPGL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in AXA IM ACT Climate Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (ACLT.DE) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPGL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACLT.DE achieves a 18.77% return, which is significantly higher than JPGL.DE's 11.57% return.

ACLT.DE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 8.08%
• YTD: 18.77%
• 6M: 19.73%
• 1Y: 31.52%
• 3Y*: 16.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JPGL.DE

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 3.07%
• YTD: 11.57%
• 6M: 12.21%
• 1Y: 19.57%
• 3Y*: 13.57%
• 5Y*: 10.25%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACLT.DE vs. JPGL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ACLT.DE AXA IM ACT Climate Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc	18.77%	8.42%	19.92%	14.36%	10.19%
JPGL.DE JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating	11.57%	5.18%	16.53%	9.74%	2.91%

Correlation

The correlation between ACLT.DE and JPGL.DE is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2022	0.75

The correlation between ACLT.DE and JPGL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ACLT.DE vs. JPGL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACLT.DE

ACLT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 60
ACLT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
ACLT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
ACLT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 70
ACLT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
ACLT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 62

JPGL.DE

JPGL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 74
JPGL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
JPGL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
JPGL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 69
JPGL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
JPGL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACLT.DE vs. JPGL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AXA IM ACT Climate Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (ACLT.DE) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPGL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ACLT.DE	JPGL.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	2.28	-0.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.60	3.23	-0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.40	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.88	4.10	-1.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.96	15.50	-4.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ACLT.DE vs. JPGL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACLT.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the JPGL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACLT.DE and JPGL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACLT.DE	JPGL.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.80	2.28	-0.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.85	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.18	0.68	+0.50

Drawdowns

ACLT.DE vs. JPGL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACLT.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.54%, smaller than the maximum JPGL.DE drawdown of -35.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACLT.DE and JPGL.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACLT.DE	JPGL.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.54%	-35.55%	+15.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.07%	-4.75%	-6.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.54%	-17.34%	-3.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.10%	+0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.17%	-4.81%	+1.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.91%	1.26%	+1.65%

Volatility

ACLT.DE vs. JPGL.DE - Volatility Comparison

AXA IM ACT Climate Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (ACLT.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPGL.DE) at 2.06%. This indicates that ACLT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPGL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACLT.DE	JPGL.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.52%	2.06%	+2.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.32%	6.02%	+9.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.73%	8.55%	+9.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.77%	11.86%	+4.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.77%	15.01%	+1.76%

ACLT.DE vs. JPGL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACLT.DE has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than JPGL.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACLT.DE vs. JPGL.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ACLT.DE nor JPGL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACLT.DE and JPGL.DE in my portfolio?

ACLT.DE and JPGL.DE have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ACLT.DE or JPGL.DE?

On fees, JPGL.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACLT.DE or JPGL.DE?

JPGL.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ACLT.DE.

What is the main difference between ACLT.DE and JPGL.DE?

ACLT.DE tracks AXA IM ACT Climate Equity, while JPGL.DE tracks JP Morgan Diversified Factor Global Developed (Region Aware) Equity. They also come from different issuers: AXA IM and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for ACLT.DE and 0.20% for JPGL.DE.