PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACLT.DE vs. CBUX.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACLT.DE vs. CBUX.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in AXA IM ACT Climate Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (ACLT.DE) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUX.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACLT.DE achieves a 18.77% return, which is significantly higher than CBUX.DE's 10.28% return.


ACLT.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
8.08%
YTD
18.77%
6M
19.73%
1Y
31.52%
3Y*
16.81%
5Y*
10Y*

CBUX.DE

1D
-1.34%
1M
-2.15%
YTD
10.28%
6M
8.97%
1Y
12.32%
3Y*
8.47%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACLT.DE vs. CBUX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ACLT.DE
AXA IM ACT Climate Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc
18.77%8.42%19.92%6.04%
CBUX.DE
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
10.28%0.69%14.63%-1.37%

Correlation

The correlation between ACLT.DE and CBUX.DE is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2023

0.37

The correlation between ACLT.DE and CBUX.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACLT.DE vs. CBUX.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACLT.DE
ACLT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ACLT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACLT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACLT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ACLT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACLT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

CBUX.DE
CBUX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
CBUX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACLT.DE vs. CBUX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AXA IM ACT Climate Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (ACLT.DE) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACLT.DECBUX.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.20

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

2.91

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.96

6.42

+4.54

ACLT.DE vs. CBUX.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACLT.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the CBUX.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACLT.DE and CBUX.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACLT.DECBUX.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

1.18

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.18

0.60

+0.57

Drawdowns

ACLT.DE vs. CBUX.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACLT.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.54%, which is greater than CBUX.DE's maximum drawdown of -14.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACLT.DE and CBUX.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACLT.DECBUX.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.54%

-14.94%

-5.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.07%

-4.22%

-6.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.54%

-14.94%

-5.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.33%

+3.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.17%

-3.81%

+0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

1.91%

+1.00%

Volatility

ACLT.DE vs. CBUX.DE - Volatility Comparison

AXA IM ACT Climate Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (ACLT.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUX.DE) at 3.92%. This indicates that ACLT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBUX.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACLT.DECBUX.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

3.92%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.32%

8.63%

+6.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.73%

10.36%

+7.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.77%

11.93%

+4.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.77%

11.93%

+4.84%

ACLT.DE vs. CBUX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACLT.DE has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than CBUX.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACLT.DE vs. CBUX.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ACLT.DE nor CBUX.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ACLT.DE and CBUX.DE have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CBUX.DE is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBUX.DE is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ACLT.DE.

ACLT.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while CBUX.DE is Utilities Equities. ACLT.DE tracks AXA IM ACT Climate Equity, while CBUX.DE tracks FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: AXA IM and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for ACLT.DE and 0.65% for CBUX.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACLT.DE and CBUX.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer