ACLO vs. JMMF
ACLO (TCW AAA CLO ETF) and JMMF (JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACLO is a CLO fund actively managed by TCW, while JMMF is a Money Market fund actively managed by JPMorgan. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. ACLO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for JMMF.
Performance
ACLO vs. JMMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACLO achieves a 2.21% return, which is significantly higher than JMMF's 1.42% return.
ACLO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 2.21%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 5.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JMMF
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.42%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACLO vs. JMMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF | 2.21% | 0.27% |
JMMF JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF | 1.42% | 0.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACLO and JMMF is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025 | -0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACLO vs. JMMF — Risk / Return Rank
ACLO
JMMF
ACLO vs. JMMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) and JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF (JMMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACLO | JMMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 7.29 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 14.85 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.41 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 19.90 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 164.37 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACLO | JMMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 5.10 | 6.42 | -1.32 |
Drawdowns
ACLO vs. JMMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACLO drawdown since its inception was -1.01%, which is greater than JMMF's maximum drawdown of -0.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACLO and JMMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACLO | JMMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.01% | -0.14% | -0.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.05% | -0.01% | -0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.03% | — | — |
Volatility
ACLO vs. JMMF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACLO | JMMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.14% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.57% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73% | 0.54% | +0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.08% | 0.54% | +0.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.08% | 0.54% | +0.54% |
ACLO vs. JMMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACLO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than JMMF's 0.16% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ACLO vs. JMMF - Dividend Comparison
ACLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, more than JMMF's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF | 4.91% | 4.87% | 0.59% |
JMMF JPMorgan 100% U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market ETF | 1.59% | 0.20% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACLO and JMMF have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JMMF is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JMMF is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ACLO.
ACLO has the higher dividend yield at 4.91%, compared with 1.59% for JMMF.
ACLO is categorized as CLO, while JMMF is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: TCW and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ACLO and 0.16% for JMMF.
Find the right allocation for ACLO and JMMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer