ACLO vs. EVMO
ACLO (TCW AAA CLO ETF) and EVMO (Eaton Vance Mortgage Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACLO is a CLO fund actively managed by TCW, while EVMO is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by Eaton Vance. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. ACLO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EVMO.
Performance
ACLO vs. EVMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACLO achieves a 2.21% return, which is significantly higher than EVMO's 0.73% return.
ACLO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 2.21%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 5.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EVMO
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 0.73%
- 6M
- 0.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACLO vs. EVMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF | 2.21% | 2.03% |
EVMO Eaton Vance Mortgage Opportunities ETF | 0.73% | 3.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACLO and EVMO is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2025 | -0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACLO vs. EVMO — Risk / Return Rank
ACLO
EVMO
ACLO vs. EVMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) and Eaton Vance Mortgage Opportunities ETF (EVMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACLO | EVMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 7.29 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 14.85 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.41 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 19.90 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 164.37 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACLO | EVMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 5.10 | 1.76 | +3.35 |
Drawdowns
ACLO vs. EVMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACLO drawdown since its inception was -1.01%, smaller than the maximum EVMO drawdown of -1.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACLO and EVMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACLO | EVMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.01% | -1.89% | +0.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.91% | +0.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.05% | -0.38% | +0.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.03% | — | — |
Volatility
ACLO vs. EVMO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACLO | EVMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.14% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.57% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73% | 2.83% | -2.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.08% | 2.83% | -1.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.08% | 2.83% | -1.75% |
ACLO vs. EVMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACLO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EVMO's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACLO vs. EVMO - Dividend Comparison
ACLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, more than EVMO's 4.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF | 4.91% | 4.87% | 0.59% |
EVMO Eaton Vance Mortgage Opportunities ETF | 4.07% | 1.95% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACLO and EVMO have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACLO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACLO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EVMO.
ACLO has the higher dividend yield at 4.91%, compared with 4.07% for EVMO.
ACLO is categorized as CLO, while EVMO is Mortgage Backed Securities. They also come from different issuers: TCW and Eaton Vance. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ACLO and 0.45% for EVMO.
Find the right allocation for ACLO and EVMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer