ACLO vs. CLOC
ACLO (TCW AAA CLO ETF) and CLOC (AAM Crescent CLO ETF) are both CLO funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ACLO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for CLOC.
Performance
ACLO vs. CLOC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACLO achieves a 2.46% return, which is significantly lower than CLOC's 2.65% return.
ACLO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 2.46%
- 6M
- 2.51%
- 1Y
- 5.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLOC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 2.65%
- 6M
- 2.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACLO vs. CLOC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF | 2.46% | 1.01% |
CLOC AAM Crescent CLO ETF | 2.65% | 0.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACLO and CLOC is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACLO vs. CLOC — Risk / Return Rank
ACLO
CLOC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ACLO vs. CLOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) and AAM Crescent CLO ETF (CLOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACLO | CLOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.44 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 19.85 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 165.43 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACLO vs. CLOC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACLO drawdown since its inception was -1.01%, which is greater than CLOC's maximum drawdown of -0.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACLO and CLOC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACLO | CLOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.01% | -0.54% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.04% | -0.06% | +0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.03% | — | — |
Volatility
ACLO vs. CLOC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACLO | CLOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.19% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.58% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73% | 0.88% | -0.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.07% | 0.88% | +0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.07% | 0.88% | +0.19% |
ACLO vs. CLOC - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACLO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CLOC's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACLO vs. CLOC - Dividend Comparison
ACLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.90%, more than CLOC's 3.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF | 4.90% | 4.87% | 0.59% |
CLOC AAM Crescent CLO ETF | 3.66% | 1.15% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACLO and CLOC have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACLO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACLO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for CLOC.
ACLO has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 3.66% for CLOC.
They also come from different issuers: TCW and AAM. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ACLO and 0.49% for CLOC.
Find the right allocation for ACLO and CLOC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer