ACLC vs. TEXN
ACLC (American Century Large Cap Equity ETF) and TEXN (iShares Texas Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. ACLC is actively managed, while TEXN is passively managed. Over the past year, ACLC returned 15.94% vs 28.77% for TEXN. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACLC charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for TEXN.
Performance
ACLC vs. TEXN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACLC achieves a 5.55% return, which is significantly lower than TEXN's 18.51% return.
ACLC
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -1.67%
- YTD
- 5.55%
- 6M
- 4.11%
- 1Y
- 15.94%
- 3Y*
- 15.91%
- 5Y*
- 9.98%
- 10Y*
- —
TEXN
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- -3.05%
- YTD
- 18.51%
- 6M
- 17.39%
- 1Y
- 28.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACLC vs. TEXN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ACLC American Century Large Cap Equity ETF | 5.55% | 12.06% |
TEXN iShares Texas Equity ETF | 18.51% | 8.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACLC and TEXN is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025 | 0.56 |
The correlation between ACLC and TEXN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACLC vs. TEXN — Risk / Return Rank
ACLC
TEXN
ACLC vs. TEXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Large Cap Equity ETF (ACLC) and iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACLC | TEXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.35 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 4.56 | -3.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.66 | 15.29 | -8.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACLC vs. TEXN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACLC drawdown since its inception was -26.44%, which is greater than TEXN's maximum drawdown of -6.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACLC and TEXN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACLC | TEXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.44% | -6.34% | -20.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.28% | -6.34% | -3.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.55% | -6.12% | +2.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.84% | -1.29% | -4.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.40% | 1.89% | +0.51% |
Volatility
ACLC vs. TEXN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Century Large Cap Equity ETF (ACLC) is 4.74%, while iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN) has a volatility of 5.10%. This indicates that ACLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TEXN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACLC | TEXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.74% | 5.10% | -0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.19% | 10.29% | -0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.81% | 14.53% | -1.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 14.53% | +2.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.12% | 14.53% | +2.59% |
ACLC vs. TEXN - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACLC has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than TEXN's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACLC vs. TEXN - Dividend Comparison
ACLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than TEXN's 1.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACLC American Century Large Cap Equity ETF | 0.55% | 0.64% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 1.10% | 0.72% | 0.43% |
TEXN iShares Texas Equity ETF | 1.42% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACLC and TEXN have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TEXN has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to ACLC (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACLC dropped -26.44% vs TEXN's -6.34%.
On 1-year performance, TEXN leads with 28.77% vs 15.94% for ACLC. On fees, TEXN is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ACLC has been the lower-risk option at 4.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TEXN has performed better with a 28.77% return vs 15.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TEXN is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ACLC.
TEXN has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.55% for ACLC.
They also come from different issuers: American Century and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ACLC and 0.20% for TEXN.
TEXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACLC and TEXN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer