ACLC vs. DDTL
ACLC (American Century Large Cap Equity ETF) and DDTL (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July) are both exchange-traded funds - ACLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by American Century, while DDTL is a Defined Outcome fund managed by Innovator. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACLC charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for DDTL.
Performance
ACLC vs. DDTL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACLC achieves a 8.74% return, which is significantly higher than DDTL's 4.57% return.
ACLC
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 4.82%
- YTD
- 8.74%
- 6M
- 7.84%
- 1Y
- 22.81%
- 3Y*
- 17.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.97%
- 10Y*
- —
DDTL
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- YTD
- 4.57%
- 6M
- 5.34%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACLC vs. DDTL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ACLC American Century Large Cap Equity ETF | 8.74% | 8.68% |
DDTL Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July | 4.57% | 6.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACLC and DDTL is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2025 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACLC vs. DDTL — Risk / Return Rank
ACLC
DDTL
ACLC vs. DDTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Large Cap Equity ETF (ACLC) and Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July (DDTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACLC | DDTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.01 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACLC | DDTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 2.27 | -1.42 |
Drawdowns
ACLC vs. DDTL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACLC drawdown since its inception was -26.44%, which is greater than DDTL's maximum drawdown of -3.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACLC and DDTL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACLC | DDTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.44% | -3.78% | -22.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.64% | 0.00% | -0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.88% | -0.40% | -5.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.28% | — | — |
Volatility
ACLC vs. DDTL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACLC | DDTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.93% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.51% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.32% | 5.46% | +6.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.19% | 5.46% | +11.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.12% | 5.46% | +11.66% |
ACLC vs. DDTL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACLC has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than DDTL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACLC vs. DDTL - Dividend Comparison
ACLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, while DDTL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACLC American Century Large Cap Equity ETF | 0.56% | 0.64% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 1.10% | 0.72% | 0.43% |
DDTL Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACLC and DDTL have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACLC is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACLC is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDTL.
ACLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.00% for DDTL.
ACLC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DDTL is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: American Century and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ACLC and 0.79% for DDTL.
Find the right allocation for ACLC and DDTL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer