PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACLC vs. DDTL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACLC vs. DDTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Large Cap Equity ETF (ACLC) and Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July (DDTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACLC achieves a 5.55% return, which is significantly higher than DDTL's 4.76% return.


ACLC

1D
0.07%
1M
-1.67%
YTD
5.55%
6M
4.11%
1Y
15.94%
3Y*
15.91%
5Y*
9.98%
10Y*

DDTL

1D
0.00%
1M
0.34%
YTD
4.76%
6M
4.51%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACLC vs. DDTL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ACLC and DDTL is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025

0.77

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACLC vs. DDTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACLC
ACLC Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
ACLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACLC Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
ACLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACLC Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

DDTL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACLC vs. DDTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Large Cap Equity ETF (ACLC) and Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July (DDTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ACLCDDTLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.66

ACLC vs. DDTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ACLC vs. DDTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACLC drawdown since its inception was -26.44%, which is greater than DDTL's maximum drawdown of -3.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACLC and DDTL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACLCDDTLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.44%

-3.78%

-22.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.55%

0.00%

-3.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.84%

-0.45%

-5.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.40%

Volatility

ACLC vs. DDTL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACLCDDTLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.81%

5.59%

+7.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.27%

5.59%

+11.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.12%

5.59%

+11.53%

ACLC vs. DDTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACLC has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than DDTL's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACLC vs. DDTL - Dividend Comparison

ACLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, while DDTL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ACLC
American Century Large Cap Equity ETF
0.55%0.64%0.89%1.09%1.10%0.72%0.43%
DDTL
Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACLC and DDTL have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ACLC is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ACLC is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDTL.

ACLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.00% for DDTL.

ACLC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DDTL is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: American Century and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ACLC and 0.79% for DDTL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACLC and DDTL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer