ACIZX vs. ALMAX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

ACIZX (Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Institutional Class Z-2) and ALMAX (Alger Weatherbie Specialized Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - ACIZX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Alger, while ALMAX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Alger. Over the past 5 years, ACIZX returned 21.57%/yr vs -3.35%/yr for ALMAX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACIZX charges 0.88%/yr vs 1.20%/yr for ALMAX.

Performance

ACIZX vs. ALMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Institutional Class Z-2 (ACIZX) and Alger Weatherbie Specialized Growth Fund (ALMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACIZX achieves a 15.90% return, which is significantly higher than ALMAX's 6.67% return.

ACIZX

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 5.39%
• YTD: 15.90%
• 6M: 14.25%
• 1Y: 43.53%
• 3Y*: 44.34%
• 5Y*: 21.57%
• 10Y*: —

ALMAX

• 1D: 1.57%
• 1M: 0.88%
• YTD: 6.67%
• 6M: 4.72%
• 1Y: 14.74%
• 3Y*: 8.69%
• 5Y*: -3.35%
• 10Y*: 8.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACIZX vs. ALMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ACIZX Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Institutional Class Z-2	15.90%	32.21%	70.41%	43.41%	-36.67%	18.75%	41.96%	33.55%	-0.51%	30.26%
ALMAX Alger Weatherbie Specialized Growth Fund	6.67%	0.50%	13.78%	11.22%	-38.11%	5.83%	56.85%	39.17%	-4.10%	20.48%

Correlation

The correlation between ACIZX and ALMAX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	0.75

The correlation between ACIZX and ALMAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ACIZX vs. ALMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACIZX

ACIZX Risk / Return Rank: 42
ACIZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
ACIZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
ACIZX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
ACIZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
ACIZX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

ALMAX

ALMAX Risk / Return Rank: 9
ALMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
ALMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
ALMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
ALMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
ALMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACIZX vs. ALMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Institutional Class Z-2 (ACIZX) and Alger Weatherbie Specialized Growth Fund (ALMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ACIZX	ALMAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	0.69	+1.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	1.14	+1.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.13	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.34	0.71	+1.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.76	2.18	+5.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ACIZX vs. ALMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACIZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the ALMAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACIZX and ALMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACIZX	ALMAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.04	0.69	+1.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	-0.12	+0.88
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.33	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.89	0.33	+0.57

Drawdowns

ACIZX vs. ALMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACIZX drawdown since its inception was -46.45%, smaller than the maximum ALMAX drawdown of -60.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACIZX and ALMAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACIZX	ALMAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.45%	-60.51%	+14.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.52%	-20.91%	+2.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.73%	-29.61%	+1.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-46.45%	-53.89%	+7.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-53.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.34%	-30.74%	+29.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.58%	-17.33%	+6.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.57%	6.83%	-1.26%

Volatility

ACIZX vs. ALMAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Institutional Class Z-2 (ACIZX) is 5.36%, while Alger Weatherbie Specialized Growth Fund (ALMAX) has a volatility of 6.07%. This indicates that ACIZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACIZX	ALMAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.36%	6.07%	-0.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.06%	17.07%	-1.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.23%	21.72%	-0.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.26%	29.18%	-0.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.62%	27.25%	-1.63%

ACIZX vs. ALMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACIZX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than ALMAX's 1.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACIZX vs. ALMAX - Dividend Comparison

ACIZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.77%, while ALMAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACIZX Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Institutional Class Z-2	5.77%	6.69%	24.95%	7.80%	3.78%	18.91%	16.31%	10.21%	12.29%	6.72%	0.00%	0.00%
ALMAX Alger Weatherbie Specialized Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	24.48%	4.64%	4.00%	9.86%	0.00%	12.44%	55.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACIZX and ALMAX in my portfolio?

ACIZX and ALMAX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ACIZX or ALMAX?

ALMAX has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to ACIZX (5.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACIZX dropped -46.45% vs ALMAX's -60.51%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACIZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.