PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACITX vs. SWRSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACITX vs. SWRSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Inflation-Adjusted Bond Fund (ACITX) and Schwab Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Index Fund (SWRSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ACITX having a 1.70% return and SWRSX slightly higher at 1.72%. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: ACITX at 2.66% and SWRSX at 2.66%.


ACITX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.09%
YTD
1.70%
6M
1.24%
1Y
5.14%
3Y*
3.75%
5Y*
0.92%
10Y*
2.66%

SWRSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.10%
YTD
1.72%
6M
1.28%
1Y
5.28%
3Y*
4.09%
5Y*
1.23%
10Y*
2.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACITX vs. SWRSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACITX
American Century Inflation-Adjusted Bond Fund
1.70%6.68%1.68%3.17%-12.37%6.38%10.28%7.85%-1.21%4.47%
SWRSX
Schwab Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Index Fund
1.72%6.84%1.95%3.80%-12.01%5.83%10.88%8.38%-1.32%2.69%

Correlation

The correlation between ACITX and SWRSX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2006

0.93

The correlation between ACITX and SWRSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACITX vs. SWRSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACITX
ACITX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
ACITX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACITX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACITX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
ACITX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACITX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

SWRSX
SWRSX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
SWRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
SWRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACITX vs. SWRSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Inflation-Adjusted Bond Fund (ACITX) and Schwab Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Index Fund (SWRSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACITXSWRSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.30

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

2.73

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.88

8.25

-0.37

ACITX vs. SWRSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACITX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the SWRSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACITX and SWRSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACITXSWRSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

1.61

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

0.20

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.50

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.58

+0.18

Drawdowns

ACITX vs. SWRSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACITX drawdown since its inception was -15.50%, which is greater than SWRSX's maximum drawdown of -14.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACITX and SWRSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACITXSWRSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.50%

-14.29%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.05%

-1.90%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.08%

-4.46%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.50%

-14.29%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.50%

-14.29%

-1.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.88%

-0.10%

-0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.24%

-3.72%

+0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.64%

0.63%

+0.01%

Volatility

ACITX vs. SWRSX - Volatility Comparison

American Century Inflation-Adjusted Bond Fund (ACITX) and Schwab Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Index Fund (SWRSX) have volatilities of 0.85% and 0.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACITXSWRSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.85%

0.86%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.20%

2.20%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.24%

3.26%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.14%

6.04%

+0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.50%

5.37%

+0.13%

ACITX vs. SWRSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACITX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than SWRSX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACITX vs. SWRSX - Dividend Comparison

ACITX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, more than SWRSX's 3.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACITX
American Century Inflation-Adjusted Bond Fund
4.23%4.30%2.19%4.44%7.34%4.47%1.16%2.45%4.31%3.47%2.27%0.99%
SWRSX
Schwab Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Index Fund
3.78%4.20%3.68%3.11%7.95%4.45%1.33%2.20%2.87%1.75%1.81%1.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, ACITX and SWRSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SWRSX has higher volatility (0.86%) compared to ACITX (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACITX dropped -15.50% vs SWRSX's -14.29%.

SWRSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACITX and SWRSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer