ACGIX vs. NEIMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ACGIX (Invesco Growth and Income Fund) and NEIMX (Neiman Large Cap Value Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, ACGIX returned 11.17%/yr vs 10.34%/yr for NEIMX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACGIX charges 0.80%/yr vs 1.46%/yr for NEIMX.

Performance

ACGIX vs. NEIMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Growth and Income Fund (ACGIX) and Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACGIX achieves a 7.45% return, which is significantly lower than NEIMX's 17.29% return. Over the past 10 years, ACGIX has outperformed NEIMX with an annualized return of 11.17%, while NEIMX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.34% annualized return.

ACGIX

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: 1.25%
• YTD: 7.45%
• 6M: 9.24%
• 1Y: 22.54%
• 3Y*: 17.47%
• 5Y*: 9.99%
• 10Y*: 11.17%

NEIMX

• 1D: 1.26%
• 1M: 4.85%
• YTD: 17.29%
• 6M: 17.10%
• 1Y: 34.32%
• 3Y*: 19.56%
• 5Y*: 12.08%
• 10Y*: 10.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACGIX vs. NEIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ACGIX Invesco Growth and Income Fund	7.45%	15.54%	16.16%	12.80%	-6.00%	28.66%	2.33%	24.49%	-13.67%	14.14%
NEIMX Neiman Large Cap Value Fund	17.29%	18.68%	13.50%	6.15%	-5.16%	23.85%	-5.97%	23.49%	-9.76%	19.00%

Correlation

The correlation between ACGIX and NEIMX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2003	0.87

The correlation between ACGIX and NEIMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ACGIX vs. NEIMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACGIX

ACGIX Risk / Return Rank: 57
ACGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
ACGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
ACGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 48
ACGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
ACGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

NEIMX

NEIMX Risk / Return Rank: 94
NEIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
NEIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
NEIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
NEIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
NEIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACGIX vs. NEIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Growth and Income Fund (ACGIX) and Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ACGIX	NEIMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.13	3.45	-1.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.99	4.78	-1.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.63	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.19	6.10	-2.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.05	25.48	-12.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ACGIX vs. NEIMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACGIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is lower than the NEIMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACGIX and NEIMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACGIX	NEIMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.13	3.45	-1.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	0.02	+0.61
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58	0.03	+0.56
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.03	+0.42

Drawdowns

ACGIX vs. NEIMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACGIX drawdown since its inception was -53.47%, smaller than the maximum NEIMX drawdown of -92.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACGIX and NEIMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACGIX	NEIMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.47%	-92.94%	+39.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.49%	-5.75%	-1.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.74%	-92.94%	+75.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.30%	-92.94%	+73.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.51%	-92.94%	+48.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.45%	-88.99%	+88.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.94%	-10.51%	-0.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.82%	1.37%	+0.45%

Volatility

ACGIX vs. NEIMX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Growth and Income Fund (ACGIX) and Neiman Large Cap Value Fund (NEIMX) have volatilities of 2.81% and 2.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACGIX	NEIMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.81%	2.72%	+0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.54%	7.81%	+0.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.21%	10.18%	+1.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.91%	576.30%	-560.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.23%	407.70%	-388.47%

ACGIX vs. NEIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACGIX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than NEIMX's 1.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACGIX vs. NEIMX - Dividend Comparison

ACGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.80%, more than NEIMX's 0.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACGIX Invesco Growth and Income Fund	7.80%	8.36%	10.68%	13.48%	12.10%	20.78%	3.92%	8.12%	14.70%	11.35%	6.47%	8.96%
NEIMX Neiman Large Cap Value Fund	0.65%	0.76%	1.10%	1.36%	3.60%	17.65%	1.20%	2.26%	1.20%	6.64%	10.20%	4.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACGIX and NEIMX in my portfolio?

ACGIX and NEIMX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ACGIX or NEIMX?

ACGIX has higher volatility (2.81%) compared to NEIMX (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACGIX dropped -53.47% vs NEIMX's -92.94%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NEIMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.