PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACGIX vs. MSIGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACGIX vs. MSIGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Growth and Income Fund (ACGIX) and Invesco Main Street Fund (MSIGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACGIX achieves a 7.05% return, which is significantly higher than MSIGX's 5.45% return. Over the past 10 years, ACGIX has underperformed MSIGX with an annualized return of 11.13%, while MSIGX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.79% annualized return.


ACGIX

1D
-0.37%
1M
0.21%
YTD
7.05%
6M
8.57%
1Y
22.21%
3Y*
17.32%
5Y*
9.83%
10Y*
11.13%

MSIGX

1D
-0.53%
1M
2.33%
YTD
5.45%
6M
5.36%
1Y
19.51%
3Y*
17.91%
5Y*
10.50%
10Y*
11.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACGIX vs. MSIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACGIX
Invesco Growth and Income Fund
7.05%15.54%16.16%12.80%-6.00%28.66%2.33%24.49%-13.67%14.14%
MSIGX
Invesco Main Street Fund
5.45%16.02%23.66%23.06%-20.21%27.37%14.41%22.49%-8.25%16.79%

Correlation

The correlation between ACGIX and MSIGX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 1988

0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between ACGIX and MSIGX has dropped to 0.62 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACGIX vs. MSIGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACGIX
ACGIX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
ACGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
ACGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

MSIGX
MSIGX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
MSIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
MSIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACGIX vs. MSIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Growth and Income Fund (ACGIX) and Invesco Main Street Fund (MSIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACGIXMSIGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.33

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

2.00

+0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.17

8.19

+3.98

ACGIX vs. MSIGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACGIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the MSIGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACGIX and MSIGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACGIXMSIGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

1.80

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.64

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.67

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.64

-0.20

Drawdowns

ACGIX vs. MSIGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACGIX drawdown since its inception was -53.47%, smaller than the maximum MSIGX drawdown of -57.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACGIX and MSIGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACGIXMSIGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.47%

-57.22%

+3.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.49%

-10.96%

+3.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.74%

-19.91%

+2.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.30%

-26.73%

+7.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.51%

-35.41%

-9.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

-0.92%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.94%

-8.99%

-1.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

2.56%

-0.74%

Volatility

ACGIX vs. MSIGX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Growth and Income Fund (ACGIX) and Invesco Main Street Fund (MSIGX) have volatilities of 2.77% and 2.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACGIXMSIGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.77%

2.70%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.53%

9.80%

-1.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.22%

12.17%

-0.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.92%

16.91%

-0.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.23%

17.89%

+1.34%

ACGIX vs. MSIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACGIX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than MSIGX's 0.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACGIX vs. MSIGX - Dividend Comparison

ACGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.83%, more than MSIGX's 7.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACGIX
Invesco Growth and Income Fund
7.83%8.36%10.68%13.48%12.10%20.78%3.92%8.12%14.70%11.35%6.47%8.96%
MSIGX
Invesco Main Street Fund
7.11%7.50%6.06%7.40%4.68%19.19%3.17%0.89%19.62%7.50%2.96%13.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACGIX and MSIGX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACGIX has higher volatility (2.77%) compared to MSIGX (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACGIX dropped -53.47% vs MSIGX's -57.22%.

ACGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACGIX and MSIGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer