ACES vs. DTEC
ACES (ALPS Clean Energy ETF) and DTEC (ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACES is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the CIBC Atlas Clean Energy Index, while DTEC is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Disruptive Technologies Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ACES returned -8.07%/yr vs 2.70%/yr for DTEC. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACES charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DTEC.
Performance
ACES vs. DTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACES achieves a 32.49% return, which is significantly higher than DTEC's 6.02% return.
ACES
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- 20.25%
- YTD
- 32.49%
- 6M
- 32.78%
- 1Y
- 80.47%
- 3Y*
- -0.25%
- 5Y*
- -8.07%
- 10Y*
- —
DTEC
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- 11.17%
- YTD
- 6.02%
- 6M
- 5.54%
- 1Y
- 9.18%
- 3Y*
- 10.67%
- 5Y*
- 2.70%
- 10Y*
- —
ACES vs. DTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACES ALPS Clean Energy ETF | 32.49% | 25.44% | -26.71% | -20.04% | -28.44% | -19.44% | 140.33% | 51.70% | -9.63% |
DTEC ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF | 6.02% | 7.21% | 9.89% | 25.03% | -31.29% | 4.89% | 44.12% | 35.44% | -13.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACES and DTEC is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2018 | 0.71 |
The correlation between ACES and DTEC shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ACES vs. DTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ACES
DTEC
Utilities
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
ACES
DTEC
Technology
ACES
DTEC
Industrials
ACES
DTEC
Consumer Cyclical
ACES
DTEC
Basic Materials
ACES
DTEC
-
Financial Services
ACES
DTEC
Consumer Defensive
ACES
DTEC
-
Energy
ACES
DTEC
Communication Services
ACES
-
DTEC
Healthcare
ACES
-
DTEC
Real Estate
ACES
-
DTEC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACES vs. DTEC — Risk / Return Rank
ACES
DTEC
ACES vs. DTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) and ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF (DTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACES | DTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.51 | 0.51 | +2.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.09 | 0.81 | +2.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.10 | +0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.47 | 0.46 | +4.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.30 | 1.06 | +10.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACES | DTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.51 | 0.51 | +2.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.22 | 0.12 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.40 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
ACES vs. DTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACES drawdown since its inception was -79.05%, which is greater than DTEC's maximum drawdown of -42.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACES and DTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACES | DTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.05% | -42.00% | -37.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.44% | -20.31% | +2.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.68% | -21.47% | -37.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.44% | -42.00% | -32.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.14% | -2.34% | -52.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.86% | -13.31% | -25.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.91% | 8.70% | -1.79% |
Volatility
ACES vs. DTEC - Volatility Comparison
ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) has a higher volatility of 9.41% compared to ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF (DTEC) at 5.65%. This indicates that ACES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACES | DTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.41% | 5.65% | +3.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.55% | 14.03% | +8.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.32% | 18.10% | +14.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.15% | 22.04% | +14.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.58% | 22.87% | +12.71% |
ACES vs. DTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACES has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than DTEC's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACES vs. DTEC - Dividend Comparison
ACES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, more than DTEC's 0.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACES ALPS Clean Energy ETF | 0.53% | 0.70% | 1.10% | 1.44% | 1.08% | 0.71% | 0.56% | 1.79% | 0.34% |
DTEC ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.45% | 0.27% | 0.02% | 0.26% | 0.37% | 0.43% | 0.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACES and DTEC have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACES has higher volatility (9.41%) compared to DTEC (5.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACES dropped -79.05% vs DTEC's -42.00%.
On 5-year performance, DTEC leads with 2.70% vs -8.07% for ACES. On fees, DTEC is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, DTEC has been the lower-risk option at 5.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DTEC has performed better with a 2.70% return vs -8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DTEC is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ACES.
ACES has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.03% for DTEC.
ACES is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while DTEC is Technology Equities. ACES tracks CIBC Atlas Clean Energy Index, while DTEC tracks Indxx Disruptive Technologies Index. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ACES and 0.50% for DTEC.
ACES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACES and DTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer