ACDC.AX vs. HGEN.AX
ACDC.AX (Global X Battery Tech & Lithium ETF) and HGEN.AX (Global X Hydrogen ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACDC.AX is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index, while HGEN.AX is a Global Equities fund tracking the Global X Hydrogen Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ACDC.AX returned 12.87%/yr vs 9.56%/yr for HGEN.AX. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
ACDC.AX vs. HGEN.AX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACDC.AX achieves a -0.75% return, which is significantly lower than HGEN.AX's 34.18% return.
ACDC.AX
- 1D
- -5.98%
- 1M
- -18.84%
- 6M
- -11.23%
- YTD
- -0.75%
- 1Y
- 46.77%
- 3Y*
- 12.87%
- 5Y*
- 11.51%
- 10Y*
- —
HGEN.AX
- 1D
- -6.71%
- 1M
- -22.55%
- 6M
- 6.70%
- YTD
- 34.18%
- 1Y
- 81.42%
- 3Y*
- 9.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACDC.AX vs. HGEN.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACDC.AX Global X Battery Tech & Lithium ETF | -0.75% | 59.62% | 7.63% | 7.32% | -8.33% | 3.47% |
HGEN.AX Global X Hydrogen ETF | 34.18% | 43.64% | -10.40% | -20.10% | -36.18% | 7.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACDC.AX and HGEN.AX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2021 | 0.64 |
The correlation between ACDC.AX and HGEN.AX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACDC.AX vs. HGEN.AX — Risk / Return Rank
ACDC.AX
HGEN.AX
ACDC.AX vs. HGEN.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Battery Tech & Lithium ETF (ACDC.AX) and Global X Hydrogen ETF (HGEN.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACDC.AX | HGEN.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.28 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 2.71 | -0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.09 | 8.25 | -1.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACDC.AX vs. HGEN.AX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACDC.AX drawdown since its inception was -27.23%, smaller than the maximum HGEN.AX drawdown of -72.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACDC.AX and HGEN.AX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACDC.AX | HGEN.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.23% | -72.54% | +45.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.49% | -29.11% | +4.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.50% | -49.84% | +23.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.49% | -30.24% | +5.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.16% | -47.61% | +39.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.44% | 9.68% | -3.24% |
Volatility
ACDC.AX vs. HGEN.AX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Battery Tech & Lithium ETF (ACDC.AX) is 8.91%, while Global X Hydrogen ETF (HGEN.AX) has a volatility of 14.51%. This indicates that ACDC.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HGEN.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACDC.AX | HGEN.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.91% | 14.51% | -5.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.05% | 33.68% | -9.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.75% | 47.24% | -17.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.13% | 36.75% | -14.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.22% | 36.75% | -15.53% |
Dividends
ACDC.AX vs. HGEN.AX - Dividend Comparison
ACDC.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.18%, more than HGEN.AX's 0.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACDC.AX Global X Battery Tech & Lithium ETF | 13.18% | 0.91% | 6.82% | 3.96% | 0.89% | 6.76% | 0.95% | 2.39% |
HGEN.AX Global X Hydrogen ETF | 0.83% | 0.34% | 0.60% | 0.17% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACDC.AX and HGEN.AX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACDC.AX is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while HGEN.AX is Global Equities. ACDC.AX tracks Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index, while HGEN.AX tracks Global X Hydrogen Index.
Find the right allocation for ACDC.AX and HGEN.AX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer