PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AC.TO vs. HXS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AC.TO vs. HXS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Air Canada (AC.TO) and Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AC.TO achieves a 28.25% return, which is significantly higher than HXS.TO's 13.44% return.


AC.TO

1D
1.02%
1M
12.10%
YTD
28.25%
6M
28.92%
1Y
17.42%
3Y*
-0.33%
5Y*
-0.60%
10Y*
10.78%

HXS.TO

1D
0.63%
1M
1.77%
YTD
13.44%
6M
12.73%
1Y
26.56%
3Y*
22.71%
5Y*
15.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AC.TO vs. HXS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AC.TO
Air Canada
28.25%-13.34%19.10%-3.61%-8.23%-7.20%-53.06%47.49%
HXS.TO
Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF
13.44%11.93%34.98%23.22%-12.72%27.30%15.78%15.85%

Correlation

The correlation between AC.TO and HXS.TO is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2019

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AC.TO vs. HXS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AC.TO
AC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
AC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
AC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
AC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
AC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

HXS.TO
HXS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
HXS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
HXS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AC.TO vs. HXS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Air Canada (AC.TO) and Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AC.TOHXS.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.39

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.61

3.05

-2.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.00

11.35

-10.34

AC.TO vs. HXS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is lower than the HXS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AC.TO and HXS.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AC.TO vs. HXS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AC.TO drawdown since its inception was -96.29%, which is greater than HXS.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AC.TO and HXS.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AC.TOHXS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.29%

-27.41%

-68.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.90%

-8.74%

-20.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.48%

-18.98%

-31.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.39%

-22.63%

-29.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.51%

-0.42%

-52.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.58%

-4.25%

-53.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.39%

2.35%

+15.04%

Volatility

AC.TO vs. HXS.TO - Volatility Comparison

Air Canada (AC.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.70% compared to Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO) at 4.85%. This indicates that AC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HXS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AC.TOHXS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.70%

4.85%

+3.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.78%

9.75%

+16.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.18%

12.39%

+20.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.47%

15.27%

+20.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.35%

17.73%

+24.62%

Dividends

AC.TO vs. HXS.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither AC.TO nor HXS.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AC.TO and HXS.TO have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AC.TO and HXS.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer