ABYIX vs. PQTPX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ABYIX (Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class I) and PQTPX (PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund) are both Systematic Trend funds. Over the past 10 years, ABYIX returned 3.54%/yr vs 4.30%/yr for PQTPX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ABYIX charges 1.79%/yr vs 1.51%/yr for PQTPX.

Performance

ABYIX vs. PQTPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class I (ABYIX) and PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund (PQTPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABYIX achieves a 7.88% return, which is significantly higher than PQTPX's 6.40% return. Over the past 10 years, ABYIX has underperformed PQTPX with an annualized return of 3.54%, while PQTPX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.30% annualized return.

ABYIX

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 0.93%
• YTD: 7.88%
• 6M: 9.03%
• 1Y: 16.05%
• 3Y*: 2.75%
• 5Y*: 3.73%
• 10Y*: 3.54%

PQTPX

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 1.62%
• YTD: 6.40%
• 6M: 8.65%
• 1Y: 20.99%
• 3Y*: 0.66%
• 5Y*: 3.74%
• 10Y*: 4.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABYIX vs. PQTPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ABYIX Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class I	7.88%	1.62%	1.11%	-3.29%	17.06%	3.39%	7.92%	8.84%	-6.15%	-0.09%
PQTPX PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund	6.40%	2.41%	-3.08%	-4.21%	11.37%	14.83%	9.72%	2.83%	2.30%	2.21%

Correlation

The correlation between ABYIX and PQTPX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2014	0.76

The correlation between ABYIX and PQTPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ABYIX vs. PQTPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABYIX

ABYIX Risk / Return Rank: 64
ABYIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
ABYIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
ABYIX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
ABYIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
ABYIX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

PQTPX

PQTPX Risk / Return Rank: 71
PQTPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
PQTPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
PQTPX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
PQTPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
PQTPX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABYIX vs. PQTPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class I (ABYIX) and PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund (PQTPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ABYIX	PQTPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.08	2.47	-0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.89	3.27	-0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.46	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.61	4.49	+1.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.20	12.74	+2.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ABYIX vs. PQTPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABYIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the PQTPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABYIX and PQTPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ABYIX	PQTPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.08	2.47	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	0.38	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44	0.46	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.47	+0.09

Drawdowns

ABYIX vs. PQTPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABYIX drawdown since its inception was -17.13%, smaller than the maximum PQTPX drawdown of -27.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABYIX and PQTPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABYIX	PQTPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.13%	-27.86%	+10.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.85%	-4.66%	+1.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.00%	-18.69%	+4.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.66%	-27.86%	+13.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-14.74%	-27.86%	+13.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.83%	-11.20%	+10.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.66%	-9.41%	+2.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.05%	1.64%	-0.59%

Volatility

ABYIX vs. PQTPX - Volatility Comparison

Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class I (ABYIX) has a higher volatility of 2.10% compared to PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund (PQTPX) at 1.93%. This indicates that ABYIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PQTPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ABYIX	PQTPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.10%	1.93%	+0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.91%	6.65%	-0.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.69%	8.46%	-0.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.99%	9.91%	-1.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.02%	9.38%	-1.36%

ABYIX vs. PQTPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABYIX has a 1.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PQTPX's 1.51% expense ratio.

Dividends

ABYIX vs. PQTPX - Dividend Comparison

ABYIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, while PQTPX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ABYIX Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class I	1.23%	1.33%	2.10%	2.03%	15.24%	3.68%	1.54%	8.70%	0.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.24%
PQTPX PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	14.80%	2.40%	5.63%	2.49%	0.32%	0.20%	0.00%	7.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ABYIX and PQTPX in my portfolio?

ABYIX and PQTPX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ABYIX or PQTPX?

ABYIX has higher volatility (2.10%) compared to PQTPX (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABYIX dropped -17.13% vs PQTPX's -27.86%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PQTPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.