ABYAX vs. QCFNX
ABYAX (Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class A) and QCFNX (AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class N) are both Systematic Trend funds. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ABYAX charges 2.04%/yr vs 2.42%/yr for QCFNX.
Performance
ABYAX vs. QCFNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABYAX achieves a 7.65% return, which is significantly lower than QCFNX's 18.49% return.
ABYAX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- YTD
- 7.65%
- 6M
- 8.84%
- 1Y
- 15.78%
- 3Y*
- 2.49%
- 5Y*
- 3.44%
- 10Y*
- 3.27%
QCFNX
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 6.14%
- YTD
- 18.49%
- 6M
- 19.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ABYAX vs. QCFNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ABYAX Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class A | 7.65% | 2.03% |
QCFNX AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class N | 18.49% | 1.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABYAX and QCFNX is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABYAX vs. QCFNX — Risk / Return Rank
ABYAX
QCFNX
ABYAX vs. QCFNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class A (ABYAX) and AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class N (QCFNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ABYAX | QCFNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.48 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.69 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ABYAX | QCFNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 2.91 | -2.43 |
Drawdowns
ABYAX vs. QCFNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABYAX drawdown since its inception was -17.96%, which is greater than QCFNX's maximum drawdown of -8.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABYAX and QCFNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABYAX | QCFNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.96% | -8.02% | -9.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.99% | 0.00% | -0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.22% | -1.60% | -5.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.07% | — | — |
Volatility
ABYAX vs. QCFNX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABYAX | QCFNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.04% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.85% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.68% | 14.62% | -6.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.95% | 14.62% | -6.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.00% | 14.62% | -6.62% |
ABYAX vs. QCFNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABYAX has a 2.04% expense ratio, which is lower than QCFNX's 2.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
ABYAX vs. QCFNX - Dividend Comparison
ABYAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than QCFNX's 6.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABYAX Abbey Capital Futures Strategy Fund Class A | 1.18% | 1.27% | 1.68% | 0.99% | 15.33% | 3.57% | 1.36% | 8.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% |
QCFNX AQR CVX Fusion Fund Class N | 6.52% | 7.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ABYAX and QCFNX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ABYAX and QCFNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer