ABRVX vs. SNOIX
Compare and contrast key facts about ABR Dynamic Blend Equity & Volatility Fund (ABRVX) and Easterly Snow Capital Long/Short Opportunity Fund (SNOIX).
ABRVX is managed by ABR. It was launched on Aug 2, 2015. SNOIX is managed by Snow Capital Funds. It was launched on Apr 27, 2006.
Performance
ABRVX vs. SNOIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ABRVX vs. SNOIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABRVX ABR Dynamic Blend Equity & Volatility Fund | -2.33% | -0.70% | 11.76% | 8.89% | -27.36% | 15.95% | 49.42% | 9.08% | -3.28% | 9.50% |
SNOIX Easterly Snow Capital Long/Short Opportunity Fund | 6.23% | 20.66% | 5.17% | 10.84% | -3.10% | 26.26% | 1.44% | 22.44% | -11.25% | 12.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABRVX achieves a -2.33% return, which is significantly lower than SNOIX's 6.23% return. Over the past 10 years, ABRVX has underperformed SNOIX with an annualized return of 5.55%, while SNOIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.77% annualized return.
ABRVX
- 1D
- 2.15%
- 1M
- -2.33%
- YTD
- -2.33%
- 6M
- -1.63%
- 1Y
- 3.14%
- 3Y*
- 4.63%
- 5Y*
- -0.60%
- 10Y*
- 5.55%
SNOIX
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- -0.59%
- YTD
- 6.23%
- 6M
- 11.42%
- 1Y
- 25.40%
- 3Y*
- 14.22%
- 5Y*
- 9.14%
- 10Y*
- 10.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ABRVX vs. SNOIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABRVX has a 1.98% expense ratio, which is higher than SNOIX's 1.41% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ABRVX vs. SNOIX — Risk / Return Rank
ABRVX
SNOIX
ABRVX vs. SNOIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ABR Dynamic Blend Equity & Volatility Fund (ABRVX) and Easterly Snow Capital Long/Short Opportunity Fund (SNOIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ABRVX | SNOIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.30 | 1.59 | -1.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.46 | 2.17 | -1.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.33 | -0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | 2.04 | -1.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.03 | 10.31 | -9.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ABRVX | SNOIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 | 1.59 | -1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | 0.61 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.65 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.32 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between ABRVX and SNOIX is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ABRVX vs. SNOIX - Dividend Comparison
ABRVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, less than SNOIX's 6.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABRVX ABR Dynamic Blend Equity & Volatility Fund | 1.29% | 1.26% | 2.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.33% | 24.49% | 0.80% | 3.95% | 3.26% | 1.29% | 0.00% |
SNOIX Easterly Snow Capital Long/Short Opportunity Fund | 6.51% | 6.91% | 5.10% | 2.29% | 7.07% | 8.98% | 1.86% | 1.95% | 2.06% | 4.80% | 0.36% | 2.79% |
Drawdowns
ABRVX vs. SNOIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABRVX drawdown since its inception was -29.71%, smaller than the maximum SNOIX drawdown of -65.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABRVX and SNOIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABRVX | SNOIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.71% | -65.34% | +35.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.85% | -12.55% | +1.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.71% | -17.66% | -12.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.71% | -34.43% | +4.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.71% | -0.76% | -13.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.44% | -9.86% | -1.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.80% | 2.49% | +1.31% |
Volatility
ABRVX vs. SNOIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ABR Dynamic Blend Equity & Volatility Fund (ABRVX) is 3.18%, while Easterly Snow Capital Long/Short Opportunity Fund (SNOIX) has a volatility of 3.49%. This indicates that ABRVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SNOIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ABRVX | SNOIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.18% | 3.49% | -0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.07% | 9.34% | -2.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.61% | 16.08% | -4.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.46% | 15.12% | -2.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.64% | 16.60% | -2.96% |