ABRSX vs. VMNFX
ABRSX (ABR 50/50 Volatility Fund) and VMNFX (Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past 5 years, ABRSX returned 6.24%/yr vs 12.98%/yr for VMNFX. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ABRSX charges 2.00%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for VMNFX.
Performance
ABRSX vs. VMNFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABRSX achieves a 2.29% return, which is significantly lower than VMNFX's 12.03% return.
ABRSX
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 5.56%
- YTD
- 2.29%
- 6M
- 4.49%
- 1Y
- 26.92%
- 3Y*
- 11.33%
- 5Y*
- 6.24%
- 10Y*
- —
VMNFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 12.03%
- 6M
- 14.75%
- 1Y
- 18.35%
- 3Y*
- 13.20%
- 5Y*
- 12.98%
- 10Y*
- 5.00%
ABRSX vs. VMNFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABRSX ABR 50/50 Volatility Fund | 2.29% | 6.22% | 13.84% | 38.75% | -34.12% | 40.73% | 5.69% | 79.73% | -47.83% | 6.74% |
VMNFX Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares | 12.03% | 9.27% | 5.78% | 12.23% | 13.48% | 23.24% | -11.58% | -9.57% | 0.60% | -0.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABRSX and VMNFX is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2017 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABRSX vs. VMNFX — Risk / Return Rank
ABRSX
VMNFX
ABRSX vs. VMNFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ABR 50/50 Volatility Fund (ABRSX) and Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares (VMNFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ABRSX | VMNFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.43 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 3.89 | -2.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.69 | 10.80 | -5.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ABRSX | VMNFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | 2.33 | -1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 1.81 | -1.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.34 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
ABRSX vs. VMNFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABRSX drawdown since its inception was -49.78%, which is greater than VMNFX's maximum drawdown of -26.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABRSX and VMNFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABRSX | VMNFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.78% | -26.42% | -23.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.12% | -4.65% | -14.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.83% | -5.44% | -22.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.57% | -6.75% | -37.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.56% | 0.00% | -0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.95% | -8.76% | -7.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.81% | 1.68% | +3.13% |
Volatility
ABRSX vs. VMNFX - Volatility Comparison
ABR 50/50 Volatility Fund (ABRSX) has a higher volatility of 3.06% compared to Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares (VMNFX) at 1.97%. This indicates that ABRSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMNFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABRSX | VMNFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.06% | 1.97% | +1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.49% | 5.75% | +11.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.82% | 7.79% | +14.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.37% | 7.21% | +20.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.21% | 6.39% | +29.82% |
ABRSX vs. VMNFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABRSX has a 2.00% expense ratio, which is higher than VMNFX's 1.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
ABRSX vs. VMNFX - Dividend Comparison
ABRSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than VMNFX's 3.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABRSX ABR 50/50 Volatility Fund | 0.62% | 0.63% | 1.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 47.19% | 0.00% | 10.50% | 12.88% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VMNFX Vanguard Market Neutral Fund Investor Shares | 3.13% | 3.53% | 5.61% | 5.09% | 0.75% | 0.16% | 0.81% | 3.16% | 0.94% | 1.07% | 0.38% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ABRSX and VMNFX have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ABRSX has higher volatility (3.06%) compared to VMNFX (1.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABRSX dropped -49.78% vs VMNFX's -26.42%.
VMNFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ABRSX and VMNFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer