PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABR vs. VZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ABR vs. VZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (ABR) and Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABR achieves a -28.34% return, which is significantly lower than VZ's 21.97% return. Over the past 10 years, ABR has outperformed VZ with an annualized return of 7.94%, while VZ has yielded a comparatively lower 4.44% annualized return.


ABR

1D
0.97%
1M
-8.77%
YTD
-28.34%
6M
-37.31%
1Y
-43.98%
3Y*
-19.02%
5Y*
-13.68%
10Y*
7.94%

VZ

1D
2.49%
1M
2.23%
YTD
21.97%
6M
21.50%
1Y
19.39%
3Y*
18.39%
5Y*
2.74%
10Y*
4.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABR vs. VZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ABR
Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.
-28.34%-36.65%3.16%29.73%-20.73%39.42%10.04%55.19%30.04%26.60%
VZ
Verizon Communications Inc.
21.97%8.86%13.14%2.71%-20.02%-7.55%-0.13%13.83%11.26%3.97%

Correlation

The correlation between ABR and VZ is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2004

0.20

The correlation between ABR and VZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ABR:

$1.10B

VZ:

$202.54B

EPS

ABR:

$0.57

VZ:

$4.10

PE Ratio

ABR:

9.09

VZ:

11.72

PS Ratio

ABR:

1.17

VZ:

1.46

PB Ratio

ABR:

0.47

VZ:

1.96

Total Revenue (TTM)

ABR:

$940.70M

VZ:

$139.15B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ABR:

$829.57M

VZ:

$81.89B

EBITDA (TTM)

ABR:

$878.83M

VZ:

$48.65B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABR vs. VZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABR
ABR Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
ABR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABR Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABR Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
ABR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABR Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

VZ
VZ Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
VZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABR vs. VZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (ABR) and Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ABRVZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

1.18

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.81

1.43

-2.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.56

3.06

-4.62

ABR vs. VZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABR Sharpe Ratio is -1.07, which is lower than the VZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABR and VZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ABR vs. VZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABR drawdown since its inception was -97.76%, which is greater than VZ's maximum drawdown of -50.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABR and VZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABRVZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.76%

-50.66%

-47.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.29%

-13.32%

-40.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.07%

-14.93%

-44.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.07%

-38.38%

-20.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.76%

-41.21%

-31.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.68%

-4.96%

-53.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.87%

-14.82%

-27.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.20%

6.23%

+21.97%

Volatility

ABR vs. VZ - Volatility Comparison

Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (ABR) has a higher volatility of 12.68% compared to Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) at 6.87%. This indicates that ABR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABRVZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.68%

6.87%

+5.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.16%

17.91%

+16.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.32%

22.78%

+18.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.22%

21.66%

+15.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.46%

20.36%

+20.10%

Dividends

ABR vs. VZ - Dividend Comparison

ABR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.54%, more than VZ's 5.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABR
Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.
20.54%17.14%12.42%11.07%11.68%7.53%8.67%7.94%11.22%8.33%8.31%8.11%
VZ
Verizon Communications Inc.
5.75%6.68%6.68%6.96%6.53%4.85%4.21%3.95%4.22%4.39%4.26%4.79%

Financials

ABR vs. VZ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. and Verizon Communications Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
25.74M
34.44B
(ABR) Total Revenue
(VZ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ABR vs. VZ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. and Verizon Communications Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-100.0%-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
-85.3%
60.3%
Portfolio components
ABR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. reported a gross profit of -21.94M and revenue of 25.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -85.3%.

VZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Verizon Communications Inc. reported a gross profit of 20.77B and revenue of 34.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.3%.

ABR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. reported an operating income of 8.06M and revenue of 25.74M, resulting in an operating margin of 31.3%.

VZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Verizon Communications Inc. reported an operating income of 8.24B and revenue of 34.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.9%.

ABR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. reported a net income of 12.92M and revenue of 25.74M, resulting in a net margin of 50.2%.

VZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Verizon Communications Inc. reported a net income of 5.05B and revenue of 34.44B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ABR and VZ have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ABR has higher volatility (12.68%) compared to VZ (6.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABR dropped -97.76% vs VZ's -50.66%.

VZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABR and VZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer