PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABOS vs. AVR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ABOS vs. AVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Acumen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ABOS) and Anteris Technologies Global Corp (AVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABOS achieves a 9.48% return, which is significantly lower than AVR's 108.42% return.


ABOS

1D
-4.15%
1M
-7.97%
YTD
9.48%
6M
6.94%
1Y
83.33%
3Y*
-24.74%
5Y*
10Y*

AVR

1D
1.17%
1M
8.11%
YTD
108.42%
6M
92.24%
1Y
158.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABOS vs. AVR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ABOS
Acumen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
9.48%22.67%-16.91%
AVR
Anteris Technologies Global Corp
108.42%-10.57%-7.00%

Correlation

The correlation between ABOS and AVR is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2024

0.17

Fundamentals

EPS

ABOS:

-$1.85

AVR:

-$5.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

ABOS:

$0.00

AVR:

$1.85M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ABOS:

-$45.00K

AVR:

$1.38M

EBITDA (TTM)

ABOS:

-$111.50M

AVR:

-$69.11M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Acumen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Anteris Technologies Global Corp

Return for Risk

ABOS vs. AVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABOS
ABOS Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
ABOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABOS Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ABOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABOS Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

AVR
AVR Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
AVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVR Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
AVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVR Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABOS vs. AVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acumen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ABOS) and Anteris Technologies Global Corp (AVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ABOSAVRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.31

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

3.41

-1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.45

8.61

-4.16

ABOS vs. AVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABOS Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the AVR Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABOS and AVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ABOS vs. AVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABOS drawdown since its inception was -96.41%, which is greater than AVR's maximum drawdown of -71.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABOS and AVR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABOSAVRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.41%

-71.46%

-24.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.20%

-46.77%

+10.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-90.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-90.79%

0.00%

-90.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-81.65%

-36.09%

-45.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.83%

18.48%

+0.35%

Volatility

ABOS vs. AVR - Volatility Comparison

Acumen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ABOS) and Anteris Technologies Global Corp (AVR) have volatilities of 15.82% and 15.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABOSAVRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.82%

15.97%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.55%

44.25%

+10.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

85.59%

76.59%

+9.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

97.20%

92.26%

+4.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

97.20%

92.26%

+4.94%

Dividends

ABOS vs. AVR - Dividend Comparison

Neither ABOS nor AVR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ABOS vs. AVR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Acumen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Anteris Technologies Global Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00K400.00K600.00K800.00K1.00M202220232024202520260
494.00K
(ABOS) Total Revenue
(AVR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ABOS and AVR have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVR has higher volatility (15.97%) compared to ABOS (15.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABOS dropped -96.41% vs AVR's -71.46%.

AVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABOS and AVR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer