ABNG vs. MDST
ABNG (Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF) and MDST (Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ABNG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while MDST is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Westwood. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.20, they often move in opposite directions. ABNG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for MDST.
Performance
ABNG vs. MDST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABNG achieves a 4.63% return, which is significantly lower than MDST's 19.41% return.
ABNG
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 7.69%
- 6M
- 10.51%
- YTD
- 4.63%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MDST
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 5.13%
- 6M
- 18.80%
- YTD
- 19.41%
- 1Y
- 23.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ABNG vs. MDST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ABNG Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF | 4.63% | 23.24% |
MDST Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF | 19.41% | 0.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABNG and MDST is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | -0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABNG vs. MDST — Risk / Return Rank
ABNG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MDST
ABNG vs. MDST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF (ABNG) and Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF (MDST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ABNG | MDST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.47 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.28 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ABNG vs. MDST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABNG drawdown since its inception was -33.03%, which is greater than MDST's maximum drawdown of -14.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABNG and MDST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABNG | MDST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.03% | -14.19% | -18.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.36% | -0.05% | -2.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.43% | -2.19% | -9.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.51% | — |
Volatility
ABNG vs. MDST - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABNG | MDST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.55% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.03% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.49% | 12.82% | +50.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.49% | 16.10% | +47.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.49% | 16.10% | +47.39% |
ABNG vs. MDST - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABNG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MDST's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
ABNG vs. MDST - Dividend Comparison
ABNG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MDST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.05%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ABNG Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MDST Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF | 9.05% | 10.22% | 6.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ABNG and MDST have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ABNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ABNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for MDST.
MDST has the higher dividend yield at 9.05%, compared with 0.00% for ABNG.
ABNG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while MDST is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Westwood. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ABNG and 0.80% for MDST.
Find the right allocation for ABNG and MDST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer