ABNG vs. DBC
ABNG (Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF) and DBC (Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - ABNG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while DBC is a Commodities fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. ABNG is actively managed, while DBC is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.21, they often move in opposite directions. ABNG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBC.
Performance
ABNG vs. DBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABNG achieves a 2.14% return, which is significantly lower than DBC's 29.61% return.
ABNG
- 1D
- -2.38%
- 1M
- 6.16%
- 6M
- 11.17%
- YTD
- 2.14%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBC
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- 4.58%
- 6M
- 25.13%
- YTD
- 29.61%
- 1Y
- 33.20%
- 3Y*
- 11.69%
- 5Y*
- 11.86%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
ABNG vs. DBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ABNG Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF | 2.14% | 23.24% |
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 29.61% | 0.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABNG and DBC is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | -0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABNG vs. DBC — Risk / Return Rank
ABNG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DBC
ABNG vs. DBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF (ABNG) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ABNG | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.02 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.86 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ABNG vs. DBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABNG drawdown since its inception was -33.03%, smaller than the maximum DBC drawdown of -76.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABNG and DBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABNG | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.03% | -76.36% | +43.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.68% | -25.02% | +20.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.39% | -46.11% | +34.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.85% | — |
Volatility
ABNG vs. DBC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABNG | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.14% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.79% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.37% | 18.93% | +44.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.37% | 19.30% | +44.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.37% | 17.81% | +45.56% |
ABNG vs. DBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABNG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than DBC's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
ABNG vs. DBC - Dividend Comparison
ABNG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABNG Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 2.57% | 3.33% | 5.22% | 4.94% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.59% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ABNG and DBC have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ABNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ABNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBC.
DBC has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 0.00% for ABNG.
ABNG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DBC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ABNG and 0.85% for DBC.
Find the right allocation for ABNG and DBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer