PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABNG vs. BEG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ABNG vs. BEG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF (ABNG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABNG achieves a -5.80% return, which is significantly lower than BEG's 778.97% return.


ABNG

1D
-4.57%
1M
8.99%
YTD
-5.80%
6M
-7.81%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BEG

1D
10.53%
1M
20.45%
YTD
778.97%
6M
676.57%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABNG vs. BEG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ABNG and BEG is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABNG vs. BEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF (ABNG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ABNG vs. BEG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ABNG vs. BEG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABNG drawdown since its inception was -33.03%, smaller than the maximum BEG drawdown of -59.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABNG and BEG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABNGBEGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.03%

-59.85%

+26.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.21%

0.00%

-11.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.31%

-16.76%

+4.45%

Volatility

ABNG vs. BEG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABNGBEGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.20%

212.53%

-149.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.20%

212.53%

-149.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.20%

212.53%

-149.33%

ABNG vs. BEG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ABNG and BEG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

ABNG vs. BEG - Dividend Comparison

Neither ABNG nor BEG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ABNG and BEG have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ABNG and BEG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

ABNG and BEG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABNG and BEG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer