ABNG vs. AXPG

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

ABNG (Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF) and AXPG (Leverage Shares 2X Long AXP Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. ABNG is actively managed, while AXPG is passively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

ABNG vs. AXPG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF (ABNG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AXP Daily ETF (AXPG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ABNG

• 1D: -4.57%
• 1M: 8.99%
• YTD: -5.80%
• 6M: -7.81%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AXPG

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: 15.31%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABNG vs. AXPG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ABNG Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF	15.85%
AXPG Leverage Shares 2X Long AXP Daily ETF	-9.70%

Correlation

The correlation between ABNG and AXPG is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026	0.49

Return for Risk

ABNG vs. AXPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF (ABNG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AXP Daily ETF (AXPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

ABNG vs. AXPG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABNG drawdown since its inception was -33.03%, which is greater than AXPG's maximum drawdown of -30.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABNG and AXPG.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABNG	AXPG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.03%	-30.54%	-2.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.21%	-11.13%	-0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.31%	-20.21%	+7.90%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ABNG	AXPG	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	63.20%	59.95%	+3.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	63.20%	59.95%	+3.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	63.20%	59.95%	+3.25%

ABNG vs. AXPG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ABNG and AXPG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

ABNG vs. AXPG - Dividend Comparison

Neither ABNG nor AXPG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ABNG and AXPG in my portfolio?

ABNG and AXPG have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ABNG or AXPG?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ABNG or AXPG?

ABNG and AXPG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ABNG or AXPG?

ABNG and AXPG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.