ABIYX vs. FTCNX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

ABIYX (AB International Value Fund) and FTCNX (Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class M) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, ABIYX returned 7.89%/yr vs 9.77%/yr for FTCNX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ABIYX charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.40%/yr for FTCNX.

Performance

ABIYX vs. FTCNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB International Value Fund (ABIYX) and Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class M (FTCNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABIYX achieves a 7.99% return, which is significantly higher than FTCNX's 6.82% return. Over the past 10 years, ABIYX has underperformed FTCNX with an annualized return of 7.89%, while FTCNX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.77% annualized return.

ABIYX

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 1.90%
• YTD: 7.99%
• 6M: 11.73%
• 1Y: 24.42%
• 3Y*: 18.68%
• 5Y*: 10.09%
• 10Y*: 7.89%

FTCNX

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 0.56%
• YTD: 6.82%
• 6M: 11.40%
• 1Y: 17.07%
• 3Y*: 16.28%
• 5Y*: 9.84%
• 10Y*: 9.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABIYX vs. FTCNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ABIYX AB International Value Fund	7.99%	42.41%	4.89%	15.24%	-10.62%	11.07%	2.22%	16.83%	-23.04%	25.19%
FTCNX Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class M	6.82%	25.18%	8.57%	14.02%	-6.70%	26.10%	3.82%	25.08%	-14.85%	12.87%

Correlation

The correlation between ABIYX and FTCNX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007	0.76

The correlation between ABIYX and FTCNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ABIYX vs. FTCNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABIYX

ABIYX Risk / Return Rank: 35
ABIYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
ABIYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
ABIYX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
ABIYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
ABIYX Martin Ratio Rank: 33

FTCNX

FTCNX Risk / Return Rank: 31
FTCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
FTCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
FTCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
FTCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
FTCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABIYX vs. FTCNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB International Value Fund (ABIYX) and Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class M (FTCNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ABIYX	FTCNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	1.46	+0.32
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.54	2.02	+0.52
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.26	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.15	2.49	-0.34
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.57	8.22	-0.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ABIYX vs. FTCNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABIYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the FTCNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABIYX and FTCNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ABIYX	FTCNX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.78	1.46	+0.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	0.62	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45	0.56	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	0.27	+0.02

Drawdowns

ABIYX vs. FTCNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABIYX drawdown since its inception was -69.72%, which is greater than FTCNX's maximum drawdown of -58.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABIYX and FTCNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABIYX	FTCNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.72%	-58.27%	-11.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.20%	-7.65%	-4.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.97%	-12.23%	-1.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.49%	-21.21%	-10.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.77%	-39.92%	-9.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.14%	-1.49%	-1.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.79%	-12.40%	-11.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.46%	2.32%	+1.14%

Volatility

ABIYX vs. FTCNX - Volatility Comparison

AB International Value Fund (ABIYX) has a higher volatility of 4.56% compared to Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class M (FTCNX) at 2.67%. This indicates that ABIYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTCNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ABIYX	FTCNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.56%	2.67%	+1.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.91%	9.86%	+2.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.85%	12.53%	+2.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.53%	15.95%	+0.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.66%	17.43%	+0.23%

ABIYX vs. FTCNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABIYX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FTCNX's 1.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

ABIYX vs. FTCNX - Dividend Comparison

ABIYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, less than FTCNX's 4.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ABIYX AB International Value Fund	2.67%	2.88%	10.15%	1.38%	1.39%	2.78%	0.92%	1.31%	0.52%	2.02%	0.34%	1.69%
FTCNX Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class M	4.80%	5.13%	6.90%	2.83%	3.47%	4.58%	1.99%	3.89%	6.55%	0.90%	1.08%	0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ABIYX and FTCNX in my portfolio?

ABIYX and FTCNX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ABIYX or FTCNX?

ABIYX has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to FTCNX (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABIYX dropped -69.72% vs FTCNX's -58.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ABIYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.