ABIYX vs. FTCNX
Compare and contrast key facts about AB International Value Fund (ABIYX) and Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class M (FTCNX).
ABIYX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Mar 28, 2001. FTCNX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 2, 2007.
Performance
ABIYX vs. FTCNX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ABIYX vs. FTCNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABIYX AB International Value Fund | 2.73% | 42.41% | 4.89% | 15.24% | -10.62% | 11.07% | 2.22% | 16.83% | -23.04% | 25.19% |
FTCNX Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class M | 2.67% | 25.18% | 8.57% | 14.02% | -6.70% | 26.10% | 3.82% | 25.08% | -14.85% | 12.87% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ABIYX having a 2.73% return and FTCNX slightly lower at 2.67%. Over the past 10 years, ABIYX has underperformed FTCNX with an annualized return of 7.58%, while FTCNX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.86% annualized return.
ABIYX
- 1D
- 1.63%
- 1M
- -2.59%
- YTD
- 2.73%
- 6M
- 6.79%
- 1Y
- 32.42%
- 3Y*
- 17.16%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- 7.58%
FTCNX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -3.76%
- YTD
- 2.67%
- 6M
- 7.57%
- 1Y
- 23.57%
- 3Y*
- 15.04%
- 5Y*
- 10.90%
- 10Y*
- 9.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ABIYX vs. FTCNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABIYX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FTCNX's 1.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ABIYX vs. FTCNX — Risk / Return Rank
ABIYX
FTCNX
ABIYX vs. FTCNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB International Value Fund (ABIYX) and Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class M (FTCNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ABIYX | FTCNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.95 | 1.61 | +0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.53 | 2.22 | +0.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.32 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | 2.59 | +0.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.37 | 11.30 | -0.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ABIYX | FTCNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 1.61 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.69 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.57 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.26 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between ABIYX and FTCNX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ABIYX vs. FTCNX - Dividend Comparison
ABIYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, less than FTCNX's 5.00% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABIYX AB International Value Fund | 2.81% | 2.88% | 10.15% | 1.38% | 1.39% | 2.78% | 0.92% | 1.31% | 0.52% | 2.02% | 0.34% | 1.69% |
FTCNX Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class M | 5.00% | 5.13% | 6.90% | 2.83% | 3.47% | 4.58% | 1.99% | 3.89% | 6.55% | 0.90% | 1.08% | 0.15% |
Drawdowns
ABIYX vs. FTCNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABIYX drawdown since its inception was -69.72%, which is greater than FTCNX's maximum drawdown of -58.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABIYX and FTCNX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABIYX | FTCNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.72% | -58.27% | -11.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.20% | -8.35% | -3.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.49% | -21.21% | -10.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.77% | -39.92% | -9.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.86% | -5.31% | -2.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.92% | -12.48% | -11.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.18% | 2.32% | +0.86% |
Volatility
ABIYX vs. FTCNX - Volatility Comparison
AB International Value Fund (ABIYX) has a higher volatility of 7.19% compared to Fidelity Advisor Canada Fund Class M (FTCNX) at 4.78%. This indicates that ABIYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTCNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ABIYX | FTCNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.19% | 4.78% | +2.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.15% | 10.39% | +0.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.90% | 15.66% | +1.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.43% | 15.96% | +0.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.63% | 17.49% | +0.14% |